Browse Our Articles & Podcasts

Secret 1918 Vatican Archive Document Reveals Freemasonic Plot to Destroy Throne and Altar

Image: Scans of the original 3-page letter from the secret Vatican Archives. We do not have authorization to publish the full contents of the letter, but the author of this report was given permission to review it in its entirety.

Dr. Michael Hesemann, a German historian of the Catholic Church, has just given an interview to Robert Moynihan’s Inside the Vatican Magazine. In this interview, which deals with the 100th Anniversary of the apparitions of Fatima, Dr. Hesemann makes the following statement:

Also in 1917, Freemasonry celebrated the 200th anniversary of the foundation of the first Grand Lodge in London in 1717. The Masonic ideology is not only based on deism, but also on the Gnostic heresy of self-salvation and “enlightenment,” and has a decidedly anti-Catholic agenda. Just in 1917, Maximilian Kolbe, one of the greatest saints of the 20th century, witnessed a Masonic procession in Rome, carrying banners with the slogan “Satan must reign in the Vatican. The Pope will be His slave.”

One year later, the German Emperor Wilhelm II was warned by German Freemasons that the Grand Orient planned to force all sovereign monarchs in Europe to abdicate – which indeed happened in 1918 – [also] to destroy the Catholic Church and to bring Europe under the control of American Big Business, according to a document I found in the Vatican Secret Archives.

Bolshevism would be the instrument of Freemasonry to reach this goal.

Indeed, 1917 was the year of the Russian [Bolshevik] revolution which ended in a massive persecution of the Church.

Also 1917 was the year of the United States’ entry into World War I, the year when the two superpowers were born, which formed the history of the 20th century for the next 74 years. [emphasis added]

Dr. Hesemann personally rejects the view that Russia has not been sufficiently consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and denies that there is still a part of the Third Secret of Fatima missing. Nevertheless, he thinks that the message of Fatima is still with us and that some form of grave chastisement is still imminent. And this chastening might, in my view, be connected to the words quoted above: namely, the destruction of many of the European monarchies, together with the weakening and undermining of the Catholic Church. Many historic nations may also be thereby destroyed (as Our Lady implied).

Inspired by his statement that he had himself unexpectedly found an important document in the Secret Vatican Archives, I contacted Dr. Hesemann personally, and he was immediately generous and offered to share with me that original document. He has conducted extensive research at the Secret Vatican Archives since 2009. In March of 2017 and in his own preparation for the 100th Anniversary of Our Lady of Fatima, Dr. Hesemann actually published an article about this historic document in which he himself quotes the most important parts of that document.

The document which Dr. Hesemann found in the Vatican Archives files of the Apostolic Nunciature of Munich is a handwritten letter written on 8 November 1918 by the Archbishop of Cologne, Cardinal Felix von Hartmann, and addressed to the Apostolic Nuncio in Germany, Archbishop Eugenio Pacelli — who would later become Pope Pius XII. In that letter, Cardinal von Hartmann informed Archbishop Pacelli about some information that Emperor Wilhelm II just had received and which he wanted to pass on to the pope, with the help of his personal friend Cardinal von Hartmann. What follows are the most important excerpts of that historic letter:

Your Excellency,

His Majesty the Emperor just has let it be known to me “that, according to news that came to him yesterday, the Grand Orient has just decided first to depose all Sovereigns – first of all him, the Emperor – then to destroy (?) the Cathol.[olic] Church, to imprison the pope, etc and, finally, to establish on the ruins of the former bourgeois society a world republic under the leadership of  American Big Capital. The German Freemasons are purportedly loyal to the [German] Emperor (which is to be doubted!) and they informed him about it. Also England wants to preserve the current bourgeois order. France and America, however, are said to be under the full influence of the Grand Orient [Freemasonic Lodge]. Bolshevism is said to be the external tool to establish the desired conditions. In the face of such a great danger which threatens in addition to the Monarchy, also the Catholic Church; it is thus important that the German episcopacy be informed and that also the pope be warned.” So far the message of His Majesty. I have believed myself to be duty-bound to pass it on to Your Excellency, and I have to leave it up to Your judgment whether You wish to pass this message on to Rome. The stormy demand of the [German] Social Democrats that the Emperor should abdicate gives a certain confirmation to this message. May God protect us and His Holy Church in this terrible turmoil! [….] With utmost devotion and being at His Excellency’s disposal,  Cardinal Felix de [von] Hartmann.

(Source: A.S.V., Arch. Nunz. Monaco d.B. 342, fasc. 13, p. 95-96)

As Dr. Hesemann himself points out in a manuscript (written in May of 2016) which he kindly shared with me, it was only one day later that the November Revolution broke out in Germany with the consequence that the German Emperor Wilhelm II had to abdicate. The warning had come true.

Dr. Hesemann – who has authored more than 40 books and who has gained much recognition for his important research about the Armenian Genocide – concludes his report on this historic letter with the following words:

How far away we are today, 98 [now 99] years later, from such an announced [and recommended] “world republic under the leadership of American big capital,” each of us may judge for himself. The “Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership” TTIP would have brought the world certainly an immense step closer to that goal.

In this respect, the document from the year 1918 seems nearly prophetic. However, it does not describe the visions of a seer, but, rather, quotes a purported plan. Was such a plan of the Freemasonic Grand Orient also the blueprint for the European history of the 20th and early 21th century? That would certainly be a simplification, just like any conspiracy theory. However, one cannot deny that Freemasonry planned, nearly one hundred years ago, what afterwards has come true, and in an almost uncanny way. [emphasis added]

209 thoughts on “Secret 1918 Vatican Archive Document Reveals Freemasonic Plot to Destroy Throne and Altar”

    • In large part, I suspect today much the same as in The Garden of Eden, the temptation to be as gods is too seductive for many to resist. Mankind is hellbent on delusionally determined to make the world in their image.

      • OH REALLY? just some. Mankind is HEAVEN BENT AND HEAVEN BOUND if you believe what Jesus came to say. turn then and repent. THERE IS FAR MORE HOPE THAN THAT !!

    • Good question! I think some of them are indeed evil and know what they are doing and do it anyway, with great intent to (as you say) destroy Christ’s Church. But I think many who have for years “gone along to get along,” or who are less astute have so drifted from the true faith that they are not so much outright evil themselves as cooperating with it, under the guise of all the false “goods” masonry puts forward as desirable……and which so much of the world mistakes for genuine, Godly goodness.

    • IT IS THE OLD SNAKE. the father of lies… the serpent…feeling his oats…his time is short and he deceives many-. the willing& that was original in sin wasn’t it?

  1. Thus the Freemasonic Grand Orient was pleased with the New World Order that rose from the Ashes of WWI. Their diabolical goals seem largely achieved and progressing gleefully to their desired conclusion. However, they don’t yet realize that their arrogant plan will ultimately end in failure. For in Faith and Hope, we know that The Immaculate Heart of Mary Ever Virgin will Triumph in the end.

    • They know, this is why they have stifled the third secret of Fatima, and don’t want to consecrate Russia, because they know she will win. God is always the victor, no matter what the catastrophies.

      • Sister Lucia affirmed that the requests of the Blessed Mother in regards to consecration Russia was carried out. If you do not believe the messenger, then you need to ask just who you are believing.

        • Not so.

          The Collegial Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary must actually specify Russia and be done by the Holy Father in union with all the bishops of the world at the same hour on the same day.

          On June 13, 1929, in the Presence of the Most Holy Trinity, Our Lady said to Sister Lucia:

          “The moment has come in which God asks the Holy Father to order and make in union with all the bishops of the world the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this means.”

          This is what God asked for through Our Lady of Fatima on June 13, 1929.

          From Pope Pius XI to the present, NO Pope has done it exactly as God wanted:

          Pius XI – didn’t do it.

          In the 1950s, Our Lady told Sister Lucia:

          “Make it known to the Holy Father that I am awaiting the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart. Without the consecration, Russia will not be able to convert, nor will the world have peace.”

          Pius XII – 1952 – consecrated Russia BUT WITHOUT all the bishops. Our Lord told Sister Lucia that this was insufficient.

          John XXIII – didn’t do it.

          Paul VI – didn’t do it but declared Our Lady Mother of the Church

          John Paul I – died after 33 days

          John Paul II – consecrated the WORLD – NOT Russia – in 1982, 1984 and 2000. Russia was not even mentioned in *any* of these consecrations, *nor* were they performed in union with all the bishops of the world.

          Benedict XVI – didn’t do it

          Francis – 2013 – entrusted the WORLD to Our Lady – no mention of Russia. Saturday he’s supposed to entrust the WORLD (again) to Our Lady.

          When God wants something done, He wants it done HIS way. NO politician, diplomatic treaties etc, is going to bring world peace.

          Furthermore, the consistent testimony of +Sister Lucia over 50+ years is that the pope and the bishops must consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on the same day at the same hour. t The Fatima Center debunked fake letters (supposedly written by Sister Lucia) years ago.

          To give another example:

          If I retained Chris Ferrara as my lawyer and asked him to draw up my will, one of the first things he’d ask me is: “Who is the beneficiary?” and I tell him “My niece Mary”.

          During discovery, he’d find out that I have 2 nieces named Mary – Mary G. and Mary C.

          Now, being an expert attorney, he’d further ask me WHICH Mary gets my estate. If I didn’t specify EXACTLY who is my beneficiary. he’d politely decline to do any further work until I specified WHO gets my estate.

          An expert attorney like Chris (or any attorney) needs his client to work with him. Since God IS perfect, what do you think HE expects?

          I highly recommend that you and everyone check out They’re the best resource on Fatima.

          • I agree with this Margaret. I also believe that the ENTIRE and AUTHENTIC 3rd secret of Fatima has been hidden from the world. For whatever reason, they have distorted it and composed a ‘message’ or ‘secret’ that is non accusatory of the hierarchy.

          • For The Reason of ‘ The False Vatican Council II ‘ and It’s ” Novus Ordo Mass ” !!! Vatican City, Rome is NO LONGER CATHOLIC !!! ! <3 <3 Amen <3 <3 !!! !

          • Very well put and quite to the point. It is certainly frightening to consider that quite a few Bishops probably would NOT do as any Pope requested.

          • THIS IS WHAT I LEARNED TOO. It has not been done as specifically prescribed and Vatican insiders said so as well.

          • That buttresses the picture element I mentioned..fake letters too.. possibilities in GODS world are multiple.

          • I love you my sister but sorry to say if you persist in your position, you will be overtaken by events.
            PS Recall our exchange at the Remnant. I still look forward to hugging you in the Kingdom in the embrace of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, and all of God’s angels and saints.

          • FM, I love you too, and because of that, I have to say that you are wrong.

            Brian, Jacques, Weiss and Lisa posted some excellent comments here, but just to refresh your memory:

            If Russia is supposedly consecrated:

            1) where’s the period of peace promised by Our Lady? There’s war all over the globe. St. Augustine said that peace is the tranquility of order.

            2) where’s the conversion of Russia to the Catholic Faith? Fr. Joaquin Alonso, the official archivist of Fatima who spoke to Sister Lucia, said that the conversion of Russia entails the return of Russia to the Catholic Faith. Today, Catholics are a *minority* in Russia. Catholic priests can get visas for only 6 months and are kicked out by the Russian government for specious reasons or no reason at all.

            When the Holy Father and all the bishops finally consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Russia will convert to the Catholic Faith. Think of the conversion of Saul on the road to Damascus (Acts 9) but on a national scale.

            Finally, I am truly grieved that you would say that I will “be taken over by events”. This is very unlike you.

            Please check out www

            I’m going to church now to pray the rosary.

          • 1) where’s the period of peace promised by Our Lady? There’s war all over the globe. St. Augustine said that peace is the tranquility of order.

            Context, context, context.

            It was in reference to WORLD WARS.

            “You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go. To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my Immaculate Heart. If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace. The war is going to end: but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the Pontificate of Pius XI. When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that he is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of reparation on the First Saturdays. If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated. In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world” – The Message of Fatima | CDF –

            After the 1984 consecration and the fall of communism starting c. 1989, Russia hasn’t been spreading her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church.

            Repeating and paraphrasing, the period of peace is one without wars, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father caused by Russia spreading her errors throughout the world.

            How difficult is this to grasp?!

            2) Nowhere in this message is Russia’s conversion to the Catholic Faith.

            This is a grievous error on the part of those who originated this and on the part of those perpetuating this. The conversion is plain from the message. I.e::

            Russia to stop spreading her errors throughout the world which cause wars, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father.


            be [overtaken] taken over by events – Is not meant to cause you consternation but said in a fraternal spirit

            I Sent You a Rowboat
            A very religious man was once caught in rising floodwaters. He climbed onto the roof of his house and trusted God to rescue him. A neighbour came by in a canoe and said, “The waters will soon be above your house. Hop in and we’ll paddle to safety.”
            “No thanks” replied the religious man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure he will save me”
            A short time later the police came by in a boat. “The waters will soon be above your house. Hop in and we’ll take you to safety.”
            “No thanks” replied the religious man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure he will save me”
            A little time later a rescue services helicopter hovered overhead, let down a rope ladder and said. “The waters will soon be above your house. Climb the ladder and we’ll fly you to safety.”
            “No thanks” replied the religious man. “I’ve prayed to God and I’m sure he will save me”
            All this time the floodwaters continued to rise, until soon they reached above the roof and the religious man drowned. When he arrived at heaven he demanded an audience with God. Ushered into God’s throne room he said, “Lord, why am I here in heaven? I prayed for you to save me, I trusted you to save me from that flood.”
            “Yes you did my child” replied the Lord. “And I sent you a canoe, a boat and a helicopter. But you never got in.”
            Source: unknown. –

            There isn’t a a full revelation of the Third Secret pending.


            Russia is no longer spreading her [atheistic communist] errors causing wars, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father. She converted from doing that and this is plainly evident and even acknowledged by the secular world, therefore those in who ignore what is actual plain before their own eyes awaiting without basis a revelation of what is not there nor a consecration that has already been done and accepted will have no one but themselves to blame when they will be overtaken by events. The persecution of the Antichrist is here.

            Praying the Rosary is what Our Lady of Fatima wanted us to do and what the good popes have always encouraged us to do – Please remember me and mine in your rosaries as I do for all of you in my prayers.

          • FM,

            The quotation from the Vatican website uses the Third – not the Fourth (more complete) – Memoir of Sister Lucia. After the words “…and a period of peace will be granted to the world. In Portugal, the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved; etc.”

            Source: Fatima in Lucia’s Own Words. 1976: Fatima, Portugal, Postulation Centre, p. 167.

            “After the 1984 consecration and the fall of communism starting c. 1989, Russia hasn’t been spreading her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church.”

            Russia hasn’t spread her errors since 1989???

            First of all, the “fall of communism” was already planned by the Soviets. The names changed e.g. from KGB to FSB but the same people still ran things. Anyone over the age of 25 in Russia e.g. Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin et al – all grew up under communism. They were formed by communist ideology. Lenin had outlined the plan for communist domination of the world. He said that the USA would be the last to fall and that we would sell them the rope by which we would hang ourselves (I’m paraphrasing here).

            “Repeating and paraphrasing, the period of peace is one without wars, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father caused by Russia spreading her errors throughout the world.”

            Sorry, but this is still going on even today. Just look at the evening news and then tell me that there’s a period of peace.

            :The persecution of the Antichrist is here.” Not yet. THE Antichrist will come AFTER the period of peace promised by Our Lady. There may be antichrists in history but THE Antichrist hasn’t come yet.

            And yes, I know the story you mentioned.

          • FM, these promises you say applied to the Second World War. Our Lady’s words ” To prevent this ..” follow on immediately from her prophesy of the outbreak of World War II.

            But then why was Sister Lucia insistent that the Consecration should be done by 1960 “as it will be clearer then”?

          • I personally doubt Our Lady meant “conversion to Catholicism.” I think She meant conversion from communism back to Orthodoxy.

          • “…we should affirm that Lucia has always thought the *conversion* of Russia is not to be understood as being limited to the return of the Russian people to the Orthodox Christian religion, rejecting the Marxist atheism of the Soviets, but rather as a total and perfect conversion to the one, true Roman Catholic Church.”

            * = italics in original

            Source: Alonso, Fr. Joaquin. The Secret of Fatima: Fact and Legend. 1976, Centro Mariano, Madrid, Spain. English translation copyright 1979, Ravengate Press, 122 pages, pages 83-84.

            Fr. Alonso was the official archivist of Fatima, yet his monumental work on Fatima has never been published.

          • Have you considered the distinct possibility that the Fatima Center just might have been mistaken in some of its observations?

          • Yes. However, that doesn’t change the fact that Sister Lucia ALWAYS wrote her letters by hand, nor the fact that for 50+ years she insisted on the Collegial Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Even after the 3/25/84 consecration of the WORLD- NOT Russia- – Sister Lucia said that it was not sufficient. Btw, that was originally in Sol de Fatima(Blue Army) not the Fatima Crusader.

          • 1) You have considered the distinct possibility that the Fatima Center might have been mistaken in some of its observations.

            2) It was Fr. Gruner who promoted the notion that Sister “always” wrote her letters by hand.

            3) So, what proof do you have that Sister “always” wrote her letters by hand?

            Ultiimately, you are going to go back to Gruner and what he has written.

            Again, I ask you: have you considered that the Fatima Center just might have been mistaken in some of its observations?

          • 1) Have you ever considered that they might be right?

            2) & 3) The Mother Superior of her monastery said that Sister Lucia answered letters “with her own hand” (literally, “with her own fist”). Fr. Gruner simply reported the facts.

            4) In case you don’t know, +Fr. Nicholas Gruner passed away on April 29, 2015. Please don’t speak (in this case, type) ill of the dead.

            5) To answer your question, yes. I have read literature from other organizations promoting Fatima (WAF, TFP etc) and they don’t come close to the Fatima Center. That’s why I trust the Fatima Center. Please re-read #1 above. Thank you.

          • Don’t be ridiculous, Margaret. Gruner is dead, that does not mean we cannot ask critical questions. There is a growing mountain of evidence questioning his assertion and that is all.

            Yes, I have considered where F.C. is correct. You will see such in my writings on Fatima:

          • She Could not type !!!! This is The Vatican Plant… This is NOT The Real Sr. Lucia !!!

          • Irrelevant and anon sequitur
            So we should discount all documents that are typed (e.g. by a secretary) but have a signature of someone (the person whose document was typed by the secretary) who signed the typed document?!
            I can’t believe that you would actually make such a comment believing you have advanced a sound argument. What has happened to logical discourses in our day?

          • Sister Lucia lived in a cloister. Have you ever lived in a cloister? I lived in a male version for two years where I could talk twice a day after lunch and after dinner for one half hour with the 25 who were cloistered with me. We had no secretary and neither did the good sister. She wrote all of her letters by hand. In fact, she was ordered by her bishop to write down the Third Secret of Fatima when she became very ill.

          • I saw it, but the Fatima Center has much better information. I know you don’t agree, so let’s leave it at that and call it a night. (It’s 11:15 pm EDT here.)

          • Yes she did. Do a Google image search and you’ll see pictures of her in front of her typing machine.

          • Thank you so much for your kind words! I’d like to meet you too – if not in this life, then hopefully in Heaven.

          • Very well said, Margaret, thank you.

            To anyone who insists that Our Lady’s request for the consecration of Russia has been carried out according to her wishes, I only ask that they consider the current state of the world and ask themselves one question:

            Is this the peace Our Lady promised us in return for the consecration?

            Surely not.

          • Absolutely right! +Fr. Nicholas Gruner, the late founder of the Fatima Center said the same thing many times. I’ve posted their website in my reply to Weiss above.

          • I agree that the Consecration has not been carried out BUT it is also possible that this is a long process, in God’s time and not in our’s

          • Only last week, I read an article by a priest in a Catholic (sort of) publication that declared that Our Lady’s wishes regarding the Consecration of Russia were carried out by Pope John Paul II in 1984. In the very next line he said ‘Yet we haven’t seen the conversion of Russia or the promised period of peace’. Unfortunately, it appears logic was unable to coax him to the resulting conclusion that either Our Lady was wrong or that the Consecration was not performed as she had requested. I’m going to pick the juicy bits from your definitive post and email him and the paper a suitable response. Thank you!

          • Thank you for this…You did an excellent job explaining everything..I am in 100% agreement

          • I had mentioned that from perusing pictures that demanded that she did have one. THAT IT WAS IN FACT TO KEEP THE 3RD SECRET FROM US AS IT HAD TO DO WITH THE HIERARCHY and they wanted it quashed.

          • Very possible. The devil works in many different guises. As for Sister Lucia, she was indeed very earthy as a child who worked with her hands. She was not the prettiest of women but had the character of a giant. The pretty one was “the little one”. There is some controversy over the “jaw line” of a possible imposter. What I noticed quickly is a remembrance back to the painting of my late Irish grandfather. He told me that one of the most difficult things to paint Is the hands. The hands of the so called imposter are small and petite. In a few carefully scrutinized photos, the hands of the true Lucia are rough and weathered by her days in the fields. They are also quite large and she has a peasant frame and is quite raw boned. It sure looks like she was “tampered with”.

        • For 5 years, from 1984 to 1989, Sr Lucia said that the Consecration of Russia had not been carried out properly. There are dozens of testimonies about this (search in Fr Gruner website)
          She was ordered to say the exact contrary by the Vatican in 1989: The late Abbé Georges de Nantes wrote that the Bishop of Fatima, Mgr Do Amaral, confided him that he himself had been entrusted to convey Sr Lucy this order to shut up.
          Even John Paul II knew that the Consecration was flawed: “I did all I could do according to the circumstances”.
          The late Fr Amroth reported how fierce was the opposition of high ranked prelates who were at the Pope’s side during the Consecration’s Act to prevent him uttering the word “Russia”.

        • I saw at great length photographs of the young Lucia and one who did not resemble her. I had been rather new to really “surfing” the net.for hours. Has anyone seen those?

          • One thing you have to remember is that Sr. Lúcia had some serious dental surgery in 1948. That changed her feature(s) to some degree over the years.

        • Where is that “period of peace” promised? I’ve looked everywhere for it, even under my bed, and it’s nowhere to be found

        • Actually, no, Sr. Lucia’s first statement on the ’84 consecration carried the same objections she had always made to JPII’s other failed consecrations:

          “In an interview which appeared in the September 1985 issue of Sol de Fatima, Sister Lucy was asked if the Pope fulfilled the request made by Our Lady at Tuy when he consecrated the world on March 25, 1984. Sister Lucy answered: ‘Therewas no participation of all the bishops, and there was no mention of
          Russia.’ The interviewer then asked, ‘So the consecration was not done as requested by Our Lady?’ Sister Lucy answered: ‘No. Many bishops attached no importance to this act.’” (source:

          These are her direct quotes from an impartial interviewer, and they are entirely consistent with everything she had ever said on this matter. The only aberation in this record would come years later, not from a direct quote from Sr. Lucia, but rather from the paraphrases of various prelates — based on memories of alledged and unrecorded conversations — which Sr. Lucia was never given the opportunity to corroborate, let alone explain why she was suddenly contradicting all of her previous testimony on the matter.

          Moreover, if Russia was validly consecrated, tell me, precisely when did Russia convert on masse to Catholicism, and when did real and lasting peace break out the world over?

          The people who argue that Russia was validly consecrated essentially claim that while we upheld our end of the bargain, Our Lady apparently did not. Rubbish!

          • “Moreover, if Russia was validly consecrated, tell me, precisely when did Russia convert en masse to Catholicism, and when did real and lasting peace break out the world over?”

            After reading the text of Our Lady’s actual words, I’m not sure if that is actually promised. Seems to me that Russia not spreading communism throughout the world could fulfill the prophecy.

            That being said, I do not think it would hurt anything to have the Pope EXPLICITLY consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart…just to make sure. Not that it’s gonna happen under this one though :-/

          • Not so, Thomas. Russia will be converted to the Catholic Faith. Please see my replies to FM. Don’t doubt Our Lady!

          • Perhaps it will. I hope that is the case. All I’m saying is that based on the plain text of the message, I do not think it is accurate to say that Our Lady’s request was not fulfilled simply because Russia not Catholic

          • Russia’s conversion en masse to Catholicism in Our Lady’s Fatima message?!
            Sufficient to discount the proponents of the claim Russia hasn’t converted en masse to Catholicism and therefore this is proof that the Consecration hasn’t been [adequately] done.

          • I find it inconceivable, that when Our Lady speaks of “conversion” of a given nation. she could mean anything other than what the Church has always and everywhere taught regarding the matter; namely, that nations — as explicitly stated in the great commission — need to convert; i.e. repent, be baptized, and thus become Catholic. Yes, entire nations, just as the masses of nations of central America did in response of the Our Lady of Guadalupe.

          • That’s certainly a valid interpretation but it’s also certainly not the only one. Most certainly, there is nothing in there about the conversion having a “Damascus Road” quality of suddenness. I think it is entirely possible that the Consecration was done, accepted and that we will see the effects 25, 50 even 100 years down the line.

            Then again, it is entirely possible that is has NOT been done which is the reason it should be done explicitly, in union with all the bishops, without delay.

            However, to hear many people talk in the days prior to the American election and even since, Russia has not only converted but has assumed the mantle of Rightful Imperial Protector of Christendom against the Evils of Mohammedanism…

        • I personally don’t believe anything Sr. Lucia supposedly said after 1960. It’s all lies lies and more lies wrapped in more
          As the late Fr. Malachi Martin said, it was an “either/or” situation, either do what our Lady and heaven commanded, Or. Now we’re at the “or” and will see the peak of the “or” in about October from my pov.

          • I hold a similar view: when Pope Leo XIII composed the St/ Michael prayer, it was in response to a vision in which he was told that Satan would have his way for 100 years. But he was never told, to my knowledge, when those 100 yrs. would start. We are now in the 100th anniversary of Our Lady Of Fatima, coincidence?
            My gut tells me late September or early October, but I think that it will actually be just the beginning of something bigger. Fortunately, for me, I am now able to attend daily Mass since I retired.
            O Mary, Our Mother, keep us safe within Your Mantle!

          • I believe the 100 years started in 1884. Exactly 33 years later, Heaven responded by sending Our Lady of Fatima. It is interesting that St. John Paul II’s alleged consecration took place exactly 100 years from Pope Leo XIII’s vision, and the centennial of the Miracle of the Sun will occur exactly 33 years from that Consecration…

            I feel the next five months will be momentous ones for the Church and world…

          • My pastor made a compelling argument in his homily tonight that they began in 1917 though…essentially that God granted a 33 year grace period before allowing Satan to be unleashed

          • Hello Thomas! I am the author of the book “Pope Leo XIII and the Prayer to St. Michael.” In this book, I examine the question of whether Leo discussed 100 years/a century with his vision.

            Sorry to say that there is no evidence for the assertion that there was a 100 years component to his vision. If you’d like to see more, check my book:


          • Father Martin also was suspicious of statements attributed to the good sister. He was quoted as saying that “they made her say things that she never said”.

        • Your grammar is suspect (ask “whom” you are believing) and your view of historical events is clouded as well. Malachi Martin has stated that the Vatican had Sister Lucia saying things that she did not even say. The devil sows confusion to mask his own agenda. Can there be any doubt any longer that Francis is the “great confuser”?

        • Cardinal Burke is now admitting JPll did consecrate the world and people and helped communism but did not do exactly how the Virgin asked. He is now calling for it.

  2. And they have succeeded in seizing the throne of St. Peter but they will never overturn the Altar of the Church of Christ cf. After nearly 236 years, the plan to destroy all the thrones and overturn all the altars in Europe has met with incredible success with the conquering of the final and most priced throne, that of St. Peter

  3. Dr. Hickson/1P5/@skojec: Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
    I do not know if you are fully aware of how much good you do for God’s Church and his people, still wayfarers, with the publication of these articles. God abundantly bless you and yours and his work at your hands.

    • If you were looking for a way to earn some extra income every week… Look no more!!!! Here is a great opportunity for everyone to make $95/per hour by working in your free time on your computer from home… I’ve been doing this for 6 months now and last month i’ve earned my first five-figure paycheck ever!!!! Learn more about it on following link

  4. Comrades, in general, I am sure that there is no smoke without fire, particularly with regard to Russia and the sources of the capital behind the Bolsheviks, but I would point out that by the time this letter was written, at the end of the first week in November 1918, Germany was facing defeat on the Western Front following the successful Allied defence against the great German offensive of March and the Allied counter-attack of the famous “Hundred Days” following the Second Battle of the Marne.

    The country was falling apart with food riots and with calls for the ending of the monarchy which had taken them into the disaster. So Wilhelm’s abdication was more or less a foregone conclusion, although he held on until even the Army brass told him he had to go. The point being that the Masons could not have controlled affairs on the battlefield to reach that result. Not even the Generals could, given the that the technological means of directing an industrial war were missing for another ten or twenty years (this came with the fitting of effective command net radios in the early Panzers developed in secret by Guderian in the 1930s). In other words, Wilhelm lost his crown because Germany lost. And Germany lost because it was beaten on the battlefield in the West.

    In the East, with Lenin’s coup d’etat of October 1917, there is more of an argument. American money indeed found its way to the Bolsheviks and much more study is needed to ascertain the whys and wherefores of this fact.

    Masonry boasted that the French Revolution was its creation. I see no reason to think that the Russian Revolution was any different.

  5. What, in God’s Name, is “sufficiently consecrated”. It sounds like an immigration application in which a minimum number of points are required for a successful application. So, the consecration of the WORLD by Pope St. John Paul II in 1984, which never mentioned RUSSIA as demanded by heaven, and which did not involve a large number of the world’s bishops, still managed to accumulate a “sufficient” number of points to get it over the line! Here we are, in the most precarious predicament humanity has ever found itself in, and a certain precise means is given to us to deliver us from this predicament, and what is offered falls way short of what is demanded, and yet Heaven says; “That’s OK! If that’s the best you can offer, it’ll do”. Having a very pedestrian intellect and understanding, I could well be missing something here, and so I ask, in true humility, please enlighten me. PLEASE!

    • One should ponder deeply into the sybilline words of Sr Lucia when she purportedly said that the Consecration of Russia had been done properly after she had said the exact contrary for 5 years from 1984 to 1989.
      She said exactly: “The Consecration has been accepted by Heavens”.
      This in no ways means that even “accepted by Heavens” the 1984 Consecration fulfilled the wishes of our Lady.
      Indeed so far as the aims asked from Heavens are just, lawful, charitable and compliant with the tenets of the catholic Faith, it cannot be otherwise that Heavens will never “reject” a Consecration to the IHM, whichever it is.
      And it is obvious that the 1984 Consecration (though not in union with the world’s bishops nor naming Russia) was “accepted and brought good fruits, the main one being the fall of the communism in Russia together with that of the Iron Curtain.
      But where are the promises of our Lady?
      – Where is the conversion of the orthodox people to the catholic Faith? Sr Lucia spoke of “a miracle of conversion”. So far as we know, the orthodox Russia remains schismatic.
      – Where is the promised “period of peace” ?
      Certainly the Consecration of Russia remains still to be done.

      • I agree with what you say. This is my understanding; that the consecration has been accepted for what it was, and that Heaven responded graciously. I have read, (though I’m unable to verify it), that in an interview published in Sol de Fatima magazine, the official publication of the Blue Army in Spain in September 1985, Sr. Lucia stated that the 1984 consecration of the world by Pope St. John Paul II had not been accepted as that requested at Fatima because Russia had not been named as the object of the consecration, and many bishops gave no importance to the act.

      • Yes!

        Of course, heaven accepted the ’84 consecration just as it accepted the previous papal consecrations, and just as it accepts any other act of consecration which the Sovereign Pontiff makes in good will. He is Peter and whatever he binds on earth is bound in heaven. If Peter consecrates something, heaven is bound by Our Lord’s promise to accept it. What Sr. Lucia did not say, however, was that the 84′ consecration of the world FULFILLED Our Lady’s request for the consecration of Russia.

        The only “evidence” to the contrary came years after the fact, and not from Sr. Lucia speaking for herself, but rather from the paraphrases of various prelates — based on memories of alledged and unrecorded conversations — which Sr. Lucia was never given the opportunity to corroborate, let alone explain why she was suddenly contradicting all of her previous testimony on the matter.

  6. Growing up in the Post Vatican ll era I was of the thinking, whats all the fuss over the Masons? With this article my question is answered. I now understand just how dangerous they are. They are in fact enemies and plotters against Christ’s Church.

    • The freemasons, at least those who are placed in the high degrees of freemasonry where the secret is absolute under death punishment, are acting like true agents of the Devil. They made a pact of full obedience to him with a terrestrial reward of wealth, pleasures and power against the condition that the Devil becomes their soul’s exclusive owner forever.
      The number one aim of Satan is in destroying completely the only True Faith and its Church, together with all Jesus’ followers.
      They never were so powerful in the Church as nowadays.

      • This is another reason why the Holy Father and all the bishops MUST consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

      • jdumon, Can you recommend a book on the freemasons from a traditional Catholic view. I have long read that Annibale Bugnini the architect of the New Order of Mass was a freemason. Now that now causes me to think!

        • I heard that Bugnini and his cabal were determined to turn the Mass into a protestant service that any protestant could attend with no qualms. Not sure about the masonry but wouldn’t be surprised.

          • ann, It is actually factual, Pope Paul Vl had Bugnini investigated about his being a Mason. It turned out to be true and Pope Paul Vl banished him from Rome and sent him to Teran. St. John XXlll also booted Bugnini out but Paul Vl brought him back. Now that I know what a Mason is, I now question whether the Church should hold to a revised Mass which the architect was an excommunicated Latae Sententiae mason.

          • So troubling! It does cause one to gulp. But wasn’t it Cardinal Ottaviani who saved the NO from being invalid by insisting it be redone to return the meaning of sacrifice? I think he and some other Cardinals scared Paul VI into having it reworked so in a way Ottaviani saved the Mass albeit it a patched up job but valid thank God.

    • If you can find it there is information out there corroborated by a former grand orient member about the attempt to destroy the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe. It is a fascinating account I loaned the tape to someone and never got it back. Anyway the man assigned the job of destroying the image was utterly baffled st its survival and by and by got the gift of faith and confessed what he knew to the Church. It will chill your blood. These Masons in their gatherings received directions directly from a serpent like apparition the strategies for destroying the Church. Would love to find this information again. Has anyone heard this particular story? The man who gave the talk was an expert on Guadalupe but I can’t remember his name. Sigh.

      • ann, That’s very interesting. I’ve read of the bomb placed at the Altar of the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe. So, the Masons did that! I did some research and found that Mexico’s war against Spain for Independence was the plot of two Catholic Priests, excommunicated by the Church for being Masons. Benito Juarez and Jose Maria Morelos were Spaniard Priests who incited the war for Mexico’s Independence. To this day every September 15, the President of Mexico shouts out “El grito de dolores”, repeating the shout of Benito Juarez who rang the Church bells and gave this cry for Independence. Mexico every year celebrates the words of an excommunicated Mason priest. Perhaps it was God’s will that Mexico be under Spanish Rule, but Masons interfered. I’m beginning to see the Masons are all over the place in history.

  7. The Great Stalin, Thanks for that up vote. I was 6 yrs old when Vatican ll ended. Then the Nuns left in 1970. That’s when modernist catachesis became the rule. No more true Catholicism was taught. I was led by a good Monsignor to free myself from the influence of Liberalism in 1978. I still have modernist influence in myself which I am working to eradicate. The modernists caused horrific damage in many of us. Just an example of Liberalism, We were made to place on ourselves a sticker that had the letters “IALC” which stood for “I Am Lovable and Capable”. Now I think back and would have preferred to have a sticker that would have meant “I am a sinner but Christ makes all things new” and then a Catechism lesson on what it all entails. But that would have been heresy to the Modernists in the 70’s.

    • Yep I remember all of that although I am a bit older. I remember the nuns just suddenly evaporating away. And reappearing in street clothes and some of them with dyed hair. To go from a training in absolute reverence for those in consecrated life and seeing from them authentic holiness many times, this just blew me away. I was young and rebellious st the time but in my heart I had a deep place that grieved. Eventually by God’s grace I came back to the Church and started grieving in earnest. These last years it has been a great joy to see traditional orders thrive.

  8. Thank you Dr. Hickson. What is said makes sense in view of history and is now often described as the New World Order. It appears the Masonic goals have been achieved even–it would seem–that they have a Pope at their command. Malachi Martin spoke of this scenario in several of his books and pointed to the Jesuits as leaders of the crusade against the Church. We should pray to Our Lady of Fatima that the grave chastisement be soon in coming for the sake of souls.

    • And now we have the ethnically cleansed (!) (reductio ad absurdum?) term ..GLOBALIST. i DO NOT TRUST THE CURRENT FATHER. MY LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST taught us to know them by their fruits. Flamenco in the Church was the last straw. I have often to say these days in politics and such SEE THE RESULT AND KNOW THE INTENT.

  9. Thanks for this article – There was a similar exposure of a plot to overthrow the Catholic Church announced in a Catholic Newspaper in 1936. Defeat Modernism broadcast the article on a video a couple of years ago.

    An actual scan of the original newspaper article as it appeared in the UK “Catholic Gazette” issue dated February 1936, is available for download here

    • Someone posted the same thing on Catholic Truth (Scotland). I looked at those and imho, it’s NOT the missing part of the Third Secret for the following reasons:

      1) The beginning of the Third Secret starts with the exact words of Our Lady: “In Portugal, the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved…” This purported version of the Third Secret does NOT continue this sentence. Rather, it paraphrases the words of Our Lady mentioned above.

      Second, +Fr. Malachi Martin (who DID read the actual Third Secret) said that among other things, it involves Russia “and Kiev”. There’s NO mention of either in this text.

      Third, +Fr. Malachi Martin also said that when the Third Secret IS revealed, the churches will be packed with long lines for confession. Do you see that happening?

      Fourth, Pope John Paul II (now a Saint) said that he did not want to encourage world communism to make certain moves.

      Please check out They’re the best resource on Fatima.

  10. Please note the source of this supposed Masonic conspiracy: the Kaiser, who claims he received the news from Masons themselves. Also, consider the results: NOT all sovereigns were deposed (I think only two were; Europe still counts many more), the Church was not destroyed, and a world republic was not created. If there was a conspiracy, it was a flop. Finally, you really think the Masons capable of doing all that, or even ONE of them?

    • The Masons are a secret society with many, many members. The Church could not be destroyed, but to be replaced in Doctrine and practice with a false Church to take its place, because that will better suit the Masonic interests to give the people one global religion in a global republic.

  11. Let’s suppose Pope St. John Paul II, after acknowledging that the attempted assassination on him was connected with the Message of Fatima and that it is Our Lady who saved him, decides withhold part of The Third Secret. What would be his motive for doing this?!

      • Every need for MEGA HEADLINES because God’s creatures endowed with reason are refusing to be logical.
        Now spell out for us what was the great and saintly pope’s motive for withholding the Third Secret when it nearly cost him his life.

        • I know you have a little bit of a hero-worship thing going on with St. JPII, but there really isn’t a need for all the “mega-headlines.” Clear evidence is being presented that, at the very least, the consecration of Russia didn’t happen. I’m on the fence about the Third Secret personally. But one day things will be revealed. Either it has or has not been fully revealed, and there are any number of possible reasons for withholding the full text if it in fact was withheld. Fear of widespread panic, or fear of “the enemy’s” maneuvering (as mentioned in the link from The Great Stalin indicates,) or perhaps it reveals something unbecoming of the hierarchy. We don’t know, but there is reason to believe something has been left out, if only to explain the reason the consecration was not done properly. Just keep it cool and hold civil discussion.

          • Upvoted with a correction: I know a little bit of a hero-worship thing going on with you come to the defense of St. JPII [and it is clear you hold him a great saint …

          • Read what Pope JP2 said at Hulda, he hints at what more is in the secret and then says it is not desirable to spell out the details. He in fact echoes what Sr Lucia says she saw in vision in 1944 – that a celestial punishment is coming which will swallow up two thirds of humanity. The pope said it’s necessary to cleanse the Church, and can no longer be avoided.

          • Ideas, broad speculations have been presented. I presented some possibilities. Just because you don’t like them doesn’t mean they’re not valid proposals.

          • Where in my comments have indicated that I don’t like your proposals? All I have asked of those who say a great and saintly pope [who himself acknowledges that Fatima predicted events nearyly cost him his life and that he was save by Our Lady of Fatima] did not reveal the full secret, to provide a motive for the pope to do so and none has been forthcoming.

          • I already stated several. Here’s a copy-paste quote from my above comment.

            Fear of widespread panic, or fear of “the enemy’s” maneuvering (as mentioned in the link from The Great Stalin indicates,) or perhaps it reveals something unbecoming of the hierarchy.
            All of these are possible motivations. I assumed you didn’t like them because you disregarded them in your reply to that comment. Beyond broad assumptions, all of this is speculation. We can’t get any more specific without knowing the contents of the Third Secret IF the secret was not revealed in full.

          • @jonathanwabbaschwartzbauer:disqus and @the_greatstalin:disqusStalin

            Text of the Published Report

            The Holy Father was asked, “What about the Third Secret of Fatima? Should it not have already been published by 1960?”

            Pope John Paul II replied: “Given the seriousness of the contents, my predecessors in the Petrine office diplomatically preferred to postpone publication so as not to encourage the world power of Communism to make certain moves.

            “On the other hand, it should be sufficient for all Christians to know this: if there is a message in which it is written that the oceans will flood whole areas of the earth, and that from one moment to the next millions of people will perish, truly the publication of such a message is no longer something to be so much desired.”

            The Pope continued: “Many wish to know simply from curiosity and a taste for the sensational, but they forget that knowledge also implies responsibility. They only seek the satisfaction of their curiosity, and that is dangerous if at the same time they are not disposed to do something, and if they are convinced that it is impossible to do anything against evil.”

            At this point the Pope grasped a Rosary and said: “Here is the remedy against this evil. Pray, pray, and ask for nothing more. Leave everything else to the Mother of God.”

            1) The pope here is talking about his predecessors’ motive and not his.

            2) Please not the pope is reported saying that his predecessors withheld the publication of the entire Third Secret not just part of it.

            3) If the Message of Fatima [] is published in June 2006, some 17-19 years after the fall of communism, what is Pope St. John Paul II motive to reveal only part of the Third Secret when he allegedly states that his predecessors did not want to encourage the world power of Communism to make certain moves? Surely such reasoning can no longer hold.

            4) The pope is reported to have said, if there is a message in which it is written that the oceans will flood whole areas of the earth’ (my emphasis). The use of ‘if’ is no confirmation at all that that is what is contained in the message.

            5) In fact, the Message of Fatima linked in 3) above has:

            John Paul II, for his part, asked for the envelope containing the third part of the “secret” following the assassination attempt on 13 May 1981.

            The great and saintly pope hadn’t read the Fatima Message until after the assassination attempt.

            Conclusion; Clearly the Published Testimony: Pope John Paul II in Fulda, Germany (1980) [] (given as a verbatim report) does not provide any motive for the alleged Pope St. John Paul II witholding the revelation of the entire Fatima Third Secret.

          • Look, I’ve got no dog in this fight as regards the Third Secret and at this point I’m gonna bow out. I just have no interest in fighting for or against something that I’ve yet to make up my own mind on. I’ve seen evidence both for and against the revelation happening and neither is more convincing than the other. There is something fishy going on in those whole Fatima matter, so I’ll keep my eyes on it, but have fun arguing. I’m curious what you’ll think of the other comment about the Council of Florence though. We seem to have a contradiction there.

  12. This is perfectly worthless. Who were these purported American Masons (but not in Britain)? Let’s have some names. We have reason to believe Britain had long determined a contest with Germany was inevitable. Why would America seek war with Germany, other than in alliance with Britain?

    • To defend, supply and support Russia, which they were more than happy to do when the US and England handed over Poland to them.

  13. For the French Revolution, we know who the Masons were, we have their names. For the American Revolution, same deal. What are the names of these Masons stabbing the Kaiser in the back?

  14. “Dr. Hesemann personally rejects the view that Russia has not been sufficiently consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and denies that there is still a part of the Third Secret of Fatima missing.”

    He is frightfully ignorant or a liar one of the two.

          • Super, and what did you learn? What I said above is quite correct, if someone is claiming the coosecration of Russia has already been made they are either ignorant (and frightfully so) or a liar, those are the only two possibilities. If the consecration WAS made, where is the “period of peace” our Lady promised? Our lady is now a liar?

          • I don’t think you correctly understood me. I said it was a 580-page book on the third part of the secret of Fátima. I said nothing in my last post about the consecration of Russia.

          • My apologies if I have misunderstood, you asked me if I have studied the issues and that my first comment was “mildly insulting”
            The consecration is part of “the issues” no?

          • Your comment was two-pronged. As someone conversationally fluent on matters pertaining to the third part of the secret, I thought your comment was insulting to Hesemann.

  15. If Russia was truly converted today how would that change the world?

    America is now the Evil Empire and is a far more wicked state than Russia is

    Of the Four Sins crying to Heaven four vengeance, American positive Law succors all of them;

    Willful murder, Abortion.

    Depriving a laborer of his wages – Illegal invasion from the south encouraged by both parties resulting in a lowering of the wage scale. Also usury

    Sodomy – so-called gay marriage and the promotion of sodomy at all levels of govt

    Oppression of the poor: State Sponsored Usury. Property taxes

    # 1 America spends more money on war preparations than China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, United Kingdom, India, France, and Japan combined

    The war over what Sister Lucia did or did not say is a distraction from the evil confronting us.

    Besides, these warnings/prophecies are contingent on our moral behavior and so who are we as Americans to engage in magical thinking vis a vis Fatima?

    For those rightly hungering for peace in the world, we know from Catholic prophecy that the Monarchy will be restored in France and that great King will form an alliance with a great Pope and drive the Mahometans out of Europe – after civil wars in Italy, England, and France – and, subsequently, a miraculous victory over Russian troops will occur in Cologne, Germany which the world will come to understand was owing to the hand/intervention of our Triune God and there will be world peace – to be followed, eventually, by another collapse of Christianity and the rise of the AntiChrist and then the Parousia.

    IANS is a true believer in Fatima but it is of the past and is magical thinking that all would have been well if every desire of the suspended a divinis Fr Gruener had been realised.

    O, and anyone who believes what Malachi Martin says – paid doubt agent for Judaism, adulterer,, liar of the first order – then your judgement is questionable at best

    • This is ridiculous.

      There are many more things that happen in our nation that would more accurately meet the definition of “depriving a laborer of his wages and oppression of the poor” than property taxes and illegal immigration.

    • Over the years, observing personal relationships and current events (e.g., a particular undercover operation investigating “Local 210” union activities in my hometown of Buffalo, NY), I believe one thing very firmly: Things are often not what they seem. For this reason, I believe myself to be incompetent to assess the credibility of various “sides” of the “Third Secret Drama.” Everyone seems so “sincere” and “sure.” And, because of that, I agree with IANS: >>The war over what Sister Lucia did or did not say is a distraction from the evil confronting us.<>For those rightly hungering for peace in the world, we know from Catholic prophecy that the Monarchy will be restored in France and that great King will form an alliance with a great Pope and drive the Mahometans out of Europe – after civil wars in Italy, England, and France – and, subsequently, a miraculous victory over Russian troops will occur in Cologne, Germany which the world will come to understand was owing to the hand/intervention of our Triune God and there will be world peace – to be followed, eventually, by another collapse of Christianity and the rise of the AntiChrist and then the Parousia.<<

      I confess that I'm not "up" on these prophecies. Could you tell me where I can learn more about this?

  16. Russia was never Consecrated the exact way Our Lady requested and, we are now suffering the consequences and will suffer even more under Jorge. The Masonic movement initially began with the ‘French Revolution’ and we know fully are aware of their intentions. The smoke of Satan has entered the ‘Church!’


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popular on OnePeterFive

Share to...