Traditionalism and its Dangers: Reflections of a Parish Priest
Here we are and we are faced with the question, “What do we do about it?”
Is Francis Pope? My Reply to Fr. Brian Harrison
In 1378, there was a concrete case of “an ordinary lay Catholic in the pews” who had to decide whether Clement VII was Pope.
Certain Truth, or Mere Probability? Reply to Lamont and Harrison
This premise, then, is only probable, not necessary.
Reply to Fr. Harrison on Francis and Heresy
It is probably easier for a simple priest who lacks such formation to discern its truth.
Is Francis Pope? A Priest’s Reply to John Lamont
Lamont has recently added his quite weighty voice to affirm that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not pope.
German Catholics Shrug at the Pope’s Heresy
We only ever look to Christ the King – not out of disdain for the hierarchy, but as a matter of emergency.
The Hyperpapalist Interpretation of Pastor Aeternus: Why Modernists and Sedevacantists are Both Wrong
When modernists, hyperpapalist conservatives, and sedevacantists agree.
Archbishop Viganò and the Question of Pope Francis part II
Some Pontiffs were illegitimately elected or took possession of the Pontificate by fraud, yet they are valid.
Archbishop Viganò and the Question of Pope Francis
I have some concerns about certain aspects of his current position.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider on the Validity of Pope Francis
There is no authority to declare or consider an elected and generally accepted Pope as an invalid Pope. The constant practice of the Church makes it evident that even in the case of an invalid election this invalid election will be de facto healed through the general acceptance of the new elected by the overwhelming…
Fr. Altman Goes Sede
The paradox between “You are Peter” and “Get behind me, Satan,” has not been resolved in the Tradition.