Sidebar
Browse Our Articles & Podcasts

Spirit Cooking The Election: Or, The Satanic In High Places

People thought I was exaggerating about the return of paganism, the creation of neo-paganistic rites, and the mainstreaming of Satanic practices (here and here). Lo, I was not. The horrific video described below will be proof enough. But first things first.

In one of the Wikileaks emails, Marina Abramovic invites the Podestas to dinner (I only show part of the correspondence). But not an ordinary dinner.

Dear Tony, I am so looking forward to the Spirit Cooking dinner at my place. Do you think you will be able to let me know if your brother is joining? All my love, Marina

If it lasts, there is a video by Abramovic explaining the nature of Spirit Cooking. Recipes are painted on a wall in blood. The first is “Mix fresh breast milk with fresh sperm milk; Drink on earthquake nights.” The other recipes are similar; most revolve around sex (Abramovic spent much of her career stripping off).

You can look at the cookbook created by Abramovic at MOMA’s site (again, if it lasts: if not, the Way Back Machine has it). Has pictures of the the same recipes as given in the video.

Marina Abramovic in Vogue Ukraine; August, 2014
Marina Abramovic in Vogue Ukraine; August, 2014

Now, did Podesta, and those in connection with him, have a “Spirit Cooking” dinner in the manner described by Abramovic? Or did they merely bless their asparagus, dedicating it to Mother Nature or some such other drivel?

I have no idea, and neither do you. I’m guessing it was something along the lines of the latter and not the former. But who knows? It’s really too depressing to imagine the former. And so is what is shown below.

Wikipedia describes Abramovic as a “performance artist”, a term which describes people who deliver neither performances nor art. The intent is never to create beauty, but to shock and “transgress”, notions which are, to use the phrase in its classical meaning, satanic.

As proof, Wikipedia says Abramovic “pioneered a new notion of identity by bringing in the participation of observers, focusing on ‘confronting pain, blood, and physical limits of the body.'” Example? How about her “work” entitled Rhythm 10, a.k.a. “mumbly pegs”?

Making use of twenty knives and two tape recorders, the artist played the Russian game, in which rhythmic knife jabs are aimed between the splayed fingers of one’s hand. Each time she cut herself, she would pick up a new knife from the row of twenty she had set up, and record the operation. After cutting herself twenty times, she replayed the tape, listened to the sounds, and tried to repeat the same movements, attempting to replicate the mistakes, merging past and present…”Once you enter into the performance state you can push your body to do things you absolutely could never normally do.”

Rhythm 5 added the element of fire jumping, during which she lost consciousness. She built on that theme in Rhythm 2, wherein “she ingested a medication she describes as ‘given to patients who suffer from catatonia to force them to change the positions of their bodies'”. She bested herself in Rhythm 0:

Abramović placed on a table 72 objects that people were allowed to use (a sign informed them) in any way that they chose. Some of these were objects that could give pleasure, while others could be wielded to inflict pain, or to harm her. Among them were a rose, a feather, honey, a whip, olive oil, scissors, a scalpel, a gun and a single bullet. For six hours the artist allowed the audience members to manipulate her body and actions…[At the end] there were cuts on her neck made by audience members, and her clothes were cut off of her body.

Abramovic not only runs around sans couture, but she talked “Lady” Gaga into doing the same in a video entitled “The Abramović Method as practiced by Lady Gaga”, in which a nude Gaga chants and sports symbolic horns.

Or how about the 2011 Museum of Contemporary Art Annual Gala [Editor’s note: the event includes images too graphic for us to link] in Los Angeles—what an inapt name!—with Abramovic and Deborah Harry? Fairly realistic nude effigies of the two women were brought in on gurneys to a crowd and then—wait for it…wait for it—the breasts of the effigies were sliced off, then the arms sliced off, then other parts sliced off, revealing guts which were also realistic.

The “body” parts and guts were then served by shirtless men on fancy plates to the Gala attendees. The attendees were thus able to fulfill their cannibalistic fantasies. One man sidled up between “Abramovic’s” legs and ate what was there. It was obvious the expensively dressed patrons of the “arts” enjoyed their feast.

Is this the kind of Spirit Cooking Abramovic invited Podesta to?

Abramovic embraces the occult, and not just in her Spirit Cooking. Abramovic showed in my Satanism in fashion article. She produced a video called “Balkan Erotic Epic” which, among other things, features ecosexuals, i.e. those who simulate sex with dirt, and in which tumescent men mock the Cross (the link is safe).

Abramovic was interviewed by actor—actor! a real actor!—James Franco for the Wall Street Journal. Which is proof that all State media sources have sold their souls.

Abramovic, being famous, runs in high places. Such as with the Podestas, our elite masters. More evidence Christianity is dead at the top.

82 thoughts on “Spirit Cooking The Election: Or, The Satanic In High Places”

    • She is lying, which is second nature to those in thrall to the devil. The exposure of the activities of the “smart set” shows how shallow and mind-numbingly proud they are. If you’ve seen the picture of John Podesta with his hands all gunked up with Spirit Cooking, it is a monument to the moral idiocy that occurs among those who serve evil. What tools.

      Reply
  1. I heard about this this morning, and I am utterly shocked and sickened. I really don’t even know what attracts people to this BS either. I mean really, what makes people do this. I may not be knowledgeable about everything that is written about God/Jesus, or religion/faith, but there is one thing that I am 100% certain and it will never change is that evil is well evil and who wants to be a part of that. I pray God does not allow these people, “great” and small to be in positions of power, influence, and does not send out country into a pit of evil. It’s everywhere now, and I would like to know what we are going to do about it, because this cannot be allowed to “grow” and needs to be pushed back into the shadows where it belongs for the time being.

    Reply
  2. Marina Abramovic. Out of her mind or in the grip of a powerful demonic influence?

    Probably both.

    The Leaders of the Democratic Party. Out of their minds or in the grip of an all-encompassing demonic influence?

    Probably just the latter.

    Reply
  3. All this is reminiscent of J K Huysmans’ novel Là-Bas (in English Down There or, sometimes, The Damned). High society in 1890s Paris is suffused in secret with satanic worship, and the novel’s chief character, Durtal [Huysmans himself], investigates it to the point of attending a Black Mass. (I warn anyone who reads the novel in either language to skip over the Black Mass pages; they are the most horrifyingly pornographic I’ve ever come across!) And we seem to be today in a similar place, with “DC high society” deeply involved in the same outrageous behavior, all behind closed doors. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose !

    Of course, Huysmans’ personal story has an ending well worth mentioning here. He was one of the bright stars in the Naturalist movement headed by Zola. The stuff he wrote initially pleased French artistic types, most of them atheists, no end. But then he underwent a conversion. His artistic wanderings took him in a direction not at all pleasing to his former comrades, toward Catholicism. The deeper he entered into the Faith, the further he distanced himself from Zola and other writers of his ilk. And then, at the end, Huysmans gave them all (and us) his greatest lesson, his highest art. Stricken by throat cancer — he was a smoker — he was attended by nuns who nursed him. They offered him drugs to alleviate the terrible pains caused by the disease, but he refused them. He wanted, finally, to suffer so that he could in some way atone for the serious sins of his youth. In 1903, he died a repentant sinner in the arms of the Church.

    Reply
  4. Disgusting. Please pray the rosary for our nation. I believe it is the only answer. And vote next Tuesday to begin to rid our country of this filth. I know, both candidates are not acceptable. But, as a democrat, like my father and grandfather before me (since he arrived penniless on our shores) and fought for union rights and against communist infiltration of the American labor movement, I plead with you to exercise your constitutional duty and save our great nation. God bless.

    Reply
    • Vote for Trump, because Hillary Clinton and Podesta are connected and trying to subvert the Catholic Church. The Democratic Party kicked God out of their party. Trump is backed by Priests for Life and other solid pro-lifers and solid Catholics. He wants to put a solid pro-life judge in the Supreme Court and greatly help the pro-life cause.

      Reply
  5. And this election is CLOSE??? With this kind of Satanic Luciferian garbage going on among friends of our gal Hillary?? Larry Nichols spoke of trying to get the Missus out of going to an occult “church” of some kind in the ’90’s but she wouldn’t do it! Can’t turn to Jesus, no! And this might be our President-elect on Wednesday??? With Wikileaks and Project Veritas, it’s like God is giving us one last flashing yellow light, one last sign that says “DANGER UP AHEAD” for us to stop the car before it goes over the cliff and bursts into flames in a fiery explosion when it hits the ground hundreds of feet below. Pray and fast like you’ve never done before, folks

    Reply
    • Thank God the waiting is over and Donald Trump who won today will begin to clean up the political and economic mess that Obama and Clinton created, not forgetting the millions of defenseless babies that were aborted. The Obamas and Clintons are guilty of infanticide in a country that was richly blessed. May they be held accountable for their great sin.

      Reply
    • How low has America sunk – and Christians have allowed it to happen – how many Catholics supported Obama and Clinton?
      This election the evangelicals fought a good fight and won.

      Reply
  6. She creates the most pretentious garbage performance “art” I’ve ever seen in my life. Only selling her soul to Satan could make her famous, not her “talent”. LMAO

    Reply
  7. Not sure what the point of this article is. That John Podesta is an evil, non-practicing Catholic? Quite obvious. That Abramovic is a pagan and satanist? Quite obvious as well. Very little new here. And then the last line: “Christianity is dead at the top”. Wait, what? Why? Because Abramovic and Podesta are evil people, somehow “Christianity” is dead at the top?

    Not seeing the connection at all. Forgive my abruptness, I’m tired. But really, what is the point of this article and why is it in 1P5? Seems out of place, imo.

    Reply
    • Whoa there, fella. The point of the article was clearly to reinforce the truth that the reemergence of paganism is rampant in today’s society, at the very top, in fact. And, pray tell, how many stellar Christians at the top of society do you know?

      Reply
      • at the very top, in fact; Or, The Satanic In High Places
        *
        One of the interpretations of the “wickedness in heavenly places” in Eph 6:12. Nearly all at the top are now being controlled by Satan, who they worship.

        Reply
      • Errr…two different things entirely to maintain. One is: “society is rotten at the top” (and that is true). But it is another thing entirely to point to a Wiccan satanist (Abramovic) and a lapsed Catholic (Podesta) and somehow conclude that “Christianity” is rotten at the top. These people don’t represent Christianity in any way, shape, or form. Both have publicly renounced Christianity. So what are you even talking about? The article is confusing and an extended non-sequitur. Moreover, it is below the usually high standards of 1P5 and is out of place here. Those were my points.

        Reply
        • How often have you heard, “I’m spiritual, not religious” from people who also identify themselves as Catholic? Even more overtly, entire religious congregations and even parishes who extoll a “katholicism” devoid of devotion or adherence to Roman Catholic theology? These are instances of a religion increasing decomposing into a gnostic perspective. Affect, the occult, sexual obsession and ritualism, naturalism, preoccupation with the demonic are characteristic of Gnosticism, which is virulent in contemporary religious culture across ecclesial bodies and denominations, as well as within Judaism. Islam is regarded by some scholars of religion as an expression of Gnostic impulse.
          When religion – that is the rational response to authentic revelation of God is abandoned – irrational affect, sentimentality and the passions provide the substitute.
          The article is quite pertinent.

          Reply
          • Everything you say is true, except the last line. My point, which I did not think was that hard to understand, is that the author of the article arrives at a conclusion at the end of the article which the evidence in the body of the article does not support. That’s what a non-sequitur is: something that “doesn’t follow”. His conclusion simply doesn’t follow from his premises. His conclusion, that “Christianity is dead at the top” (which may or may not be true) simply does *not* follow from the evidence he adduces; namely, that Abramovic and Podesta are evil people. How is that hard to grasp? And, while many of the points you make in your comment here are true (and perhaps *should* have been included in the article) they…errr…were not made by the author of the article himself. That’s the point.

        • “Christianity is dead at the top” means that it is dead among our elite class (i.e. “the top”). This seems hard to dispute. Briggs is not saying that Christianity itself is dead. In referring to Podesta’s apostasy and Abrahamovic’s satanism, you are making the same point as he is.

          Reply
          • For “Christianity” to be dead at the top, it would have to be the case that the pope and the majority of bishops were leftists who cared more for trendy political issues like immigration reform and global warming than for Catholic doctrine and instructing the faithful about the sacraments, especially the Eucharist and Holy Matrimony.

            Wait. Oh yeah, that is exactly what we do see.

            So, yes, “Christianity” is indeed “dead at the top”. But it’s not for the reasons the author of this article cites. It’s not bc Podesta or Abramovic are evil. They do not represent Christianity. It is rather bc this pope and the majority of bishops today are very poor shepherds.

          • Again, I think you’re misinterpreting the meaning of “top” here. When Briggs writes “Christianity is dead at the top”, he’s implicitly hearkening back to a bygone era when our secular leaders and businesses elites were churchgoing men with more than a passing knowledge of Scripture, and who at least paid lip service to the Christian heritage of Western nations. It’s this Christianity that is now dead at the highest reaches of our society, replaced by giggling dilettantes who think it’s great fun to épater le bourgeois with satanic “art” and like abominations. He’s not talking about the Church, though as you note, we could certainly ask some hard questions about where our churchmen were when this transformation was taking place. But hey, those felt banners won’t make themselves!

          • I see your point, that he is not referring to Christianity *itself* being dead at the top, but to our “top” [leaders] here in the U.S. being completely secular, pagan and non-Christian; and therefore that Christianity no longer has any place in the leadership echelons of our country. Hence “dead at the top”.

            *You* [Murray] were able to state this in such a way as to be *clear* about what you meant. And now I too see what [perhaps] the author was himself trying to say. But all of this only reinforces my primary point; namely, that the article was confusing, not clear. You have made it clear, but it was not clear as written, but confusing. And that was my point from the beginning. Peace, I’m out.

  8. This must be the religion of the Democrat party celebrating evil and death. It is entirely in keeping with their platform.

    Reply
      • You might be interested in a book I’m now reading: THE DEMON IN DEMOCRACY–TOTALITARIAN TEMPTATIONS IN FREE SOCIETIES by Ryszard Legutko. The book notes the many similarities between Communism and Liberal-Democracy. From my experience in giant American corporations I would agree with his conclusions. Giant corporations have much to say about how our country is run and the laws that govern us since politicians are beholden to them.

        Reply
  9. I used to be a member of deviantArt and I cannot tell you that beside the popular cosplay “art”, the next popular art genre is macabre, horror, and gore type. Some of the artwork created digitally, painted, or expertly photographed have made me physically ill.

    It is among one reason why I left that site.

    Our society is sick. The only cure is through Jesus Christ and through the intercession of our Blessed Mother, the Ever Virgin Mary, and repentance. Make no mistake…whether Mr. Trump wins or not, hard times are ahead of us.

    Reply
  10. The Democrat party is itself a cult, so the satanic element fits in accurately. The Democrat party is a sub-cult within the larger cult of liberalism, and this is why cult members never go against their elite leaders, for to do so would be unimaginable. Jim Jones’ followers drank the kool-aid, and Democrats drink the soul killing kool-aid given them every day by their leaders.

    Reply
  11. Interesting the James Franco connection because he recently got in trouble trying to seduce an underage girl. Also Podesta is longtime friends with pervert Denny Hastert.

    Reply
  12. Spirit Cooking is actually far more sinister. Imagine placing a child in a hot oven, but not long enough to kill them, just permanently disfigure them. Spirit Cooking is the process of doing that to human souls. Twisting and tormenting souls into demons, and thus converting people to the dark side.

    Spirit Cooking is taking all that is holy in the world and turning it into unholy monstrosity. That is the true meaning.

    If America sanctifies this evil on Tuesday, then there is no going back for the human species, not ever. The change will be permanent and complete, just as it was before the Great Flood.

    Reply
  13. I wish you would please remove these ugly pictures. It’s like having a devil on your site. Really creepy. You really can’t be mad at these people, you can only be alarmed at the state of their souls. They could not be so evil without demonic possession. Does anyone know of a site where we can organize rosary intentions? We must pray for the conversion of the most heinous of these evil people – Clintons and Soros come to mind. We must pray for the conversion of the Jews no matter what the Holy Father says. especially the ones (and all their co-conspirators) owning/influencing the movie, TV, art, education, pornography, human trafficking, news media, munitions, banking and investment, psycho therapy industries who have caused so much harm to our culture and morality. They need to be converted, there is no where else for them to go for confession, forgiveness, healing and peace but the Catholic Church and yet they are seeking to destroy it via dialog. And let’s not forget Bill Gates, soon to become one of the biggest mass murderers of all time. Imagine if they all got knocked off their horses like St. Paul and used all their influence and money for good instead of evil, peace instead of war.

    Reply
  14. He’s a crazy man himself—or so his hyperventilating suggests; but Alex Jones is also an informed man. What has been addressed here, concerning “spirit cooking,” is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. I’d need a daylong hot shower to cleanse myself if I were to even hint at the Satanic sickness it involves.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popular on OnePeterFive

Share to...