Sidebar
Browse Our Articles & Podcasts

Revolution in Tiara and Cope: A History of Church Infiltration (II)

VatII-1

(Editor’s note: this is Part II of a three-part essay. You can read Part I here and Part III here.)

Part II

In search of the foot soldiers of the Alta Vendita, we arrive at our second point and the work of His Excellency Rudolph Graber, the late Bishop of Regensburg. Appointed to his See in 1962 by St. John XXIII, Bishop Graber would later serve as a Council Father, and in 1977 acted as the principal consecrator in Joseph Ratzinger’s elevation to the episcopacy. A prolific theologian, whose works were widely disseminated throughout the world, we turn today to the English edition of his 1974 volume, Athanasius and the Church of Our Time.

In the fifth chapter of this text we meet Fr. Paul Roca (1830-1893). Ordained in 1858 in the Diocese of Perpignan, France, he was made an honorary canon in 1869. From there, he taught and traveled extensively abroad until he eventually ran afoul of Rome on account of his penchant of distributing occult propaganda among the youth. A known author of Freemasonic literature, Roca was ultimately excommunicated for his heretical teaching, but he regrettably never recanted.

Instead, he continued promoting the doctrine of the Alta Vendita, speaking about “a new, enlightened Church influenced by the socialism of Jesus and the Apostles”; and for Roca this meant a Church that “might not be able to retain anything of Scholastic doctrine and the original form of the former Church”; on the contrary, just before the turn of the 20th century, Roca predicted the following:

[T]he divine cult in the form directed by the liturgy, ceremonial, ritual and regulations of the Roman Church will shortly undergo a transformation at an Ecumenical Council, which will restore it to the veritable simplicity of the golden age of the Apostles in accordance with the dictates of conscience and modern civilization.

Restoration? Simplicity? Apostolic Renaissance? Adaptation to modern times? Dictates of conscience? Has an Ecumenical Council ever taken up such themes, and in the context of the liturgy no less? Even in hindsight, one could hardly concoct a more precise litany of the ideas that animated Vatican II. Thus, if St. John XXIII announced the Council to a stunned silence, we can safely assume – at least for those prelates of Roca’s ilk – that this silence had more to do with satisfaction than shock; but what should not be shocking to anyone who calls himself Catholic is the idea that Freemasonry should ever gain such influence in the Church.

Which leads us to our third point, and the approved apparitions of Our Lady of Good Success. Beginning in the late 1500’s, a Spanish Conceptionist nun, Mother Mariana de Jesus Torres, began receiving visitations from the Mother of God at her convent in Quito, Ecuador. Complete with the commissioning of a miraculous statue, added to a multitude of prophecies which have since come to pass, the Blessed Virgin spoke particularly about the pernicious activities of Masonic sects that would erupt in the 19th and 20th centuries; what is of special importance for our purposes is the fact that Freemasonry was not even founded until 1717 in London, England. That we should find such an exact descriptor – over a century in advance and on the opposite side of the world – is by itself a testament to the prophetic nature of these startling revelations:

Thus, I make it known to you that from the end of the 19th century and from shortly after the middle of the 20th century…the passions will erupt and there will be a total corruption of morals, for Satan will reign almost completely through the Masonic sects. They will focus principally on the children in order to sustain this general corruption. Woe to the children of these times! It will be difficult to receive the Sacrament of Baptism and also the Sacrament of Confirmation. They will receive the Sacrament of Confession only if they remain in Catholic schools, for the Devil will make a great effort to destroy it through persons in position of authority. The same thing will happen with the Sacrament of Holy Communion. Alas! How deeply I grieve to manifest to you the many enormous sacrileges – both public as well as secret – that will occur from profanation of the Holy Eucharist… My Most Holy Son will see Himself cast upon the ground and trampled upon by filthy feet… Often, during this epoch the enemies of Jesus Christ, instigated by the Devil, will steal consecrated Hosts from the churches so that they might profane the Eucharistic Species… The Sacrament of Extreme Unction will be little valued. Many people will die without receiving it… As for the Sacrament of Matrimony, which symbolizes the union of Christ with His Church, it will be attacked and deeply profaned. Freemasonry, which will then be in power, will enact iniquitous laws with the aim of doing away with this sacrament, making it easy for everyone to live in sin and encouraging the procreation of illegitimate children born without the blessing of the Church… Added to this will be the effects of secular education, which will be one reason for the death of priestly and religious vocations. The Sacrament of Holy Orders will be ridiculed… The Devil will try to persecute the ministers of the Lord in every possible way; he will labor with cruel and subtle astuteness to deviate them from the spirit of their vocation and will corrupt many of them. These depraved priests, who will scandalize the Christian people, will make the hatred of bad Catholics and the enemies of the Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church fall upon all priests… Unhappy times will come wherein those who should fearlessly defend the rights of the Church will instead, blinded despite the light, give their hand to the Church’s enemies and do their bidding. But when [evil] seems triumphant and when authority abuses its power, committing all manner of injustice and oppressing the weak, their ruin shall be near. They will fall and crash to the ground.

That’s all seven sacraments (in case you weren’t counting) and all – according to Our Lady’s prophecy – wasting away under the withering influence of the Devil reigning in the Church through Masonic sects. It reads like a narrative description of our times, and here we have explicit references to a mode of liturgical life which lends itself to the Holy Eucharist being trampled underfoot. Considering the manner in which Mass was celebrated in the 1600’s, who could imagine such a thing without also imagining some corresponding degradation in the character of the liturgy? And note also the parallels with the Instruction: targeting the youth, infiltrating schools, and corrupting morals. If the Masons laid out their strategy for destruction, the Blessed Virgin described its rotten fruit in morbid detail. Is it any wonder that Pope Leo XIII had this to say about Freemasonry in his 1884 encyclical Humanum Genus?

The race of man, after its miserable fall from God, the Creator and the Giver of heavenly gifts, “through the envy of the devil,” separated into two diverse and opposite parts, of which the one steadfastly contends for truth and virtue, the other of those things which are contrary to virtue and to truth. The one is the kingdom of God on earth, namely, the true Church of Jesus Christ… The other is the kingdom of Satan… At every period of time each has been in conflict with the other, with a variety and multiplicity of weapons and of warfare, although not always with equal ardour and assault. At this period, however, the partisans of evil seems to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons… They are planning the destruction of holy Church…with the set purpose of utterly despoiling the nations of Christendom, if it were possible, of the blessings obtained for us through Jesus Christ our Saviour.

Relentless in his condemnation the Holy Pontiff excoriates Freemasonry for its perpetration of all manner of public crimes. Among these (which ought to sound familiar to those of us now suffering through them) he includes the propagation of lewd materials and unbounded sexual license “by which virtue may be lulled to sleep” (20); the promotion of relativism, religious indifferentism, and the dissolubility of marriage (21); the co-opting of education and the replacement of religious instructors with laymen (21); the elimination of God from governance, and the erosion of Natural Law and hierarchical social structures in exchange for a materialistic and hyper-egalitarian majority rule (22); and ultimately, the very destruction of religion and the Church founded by Jesus Christ (24). The Holy Father continues:

In this insane and wicked endeavor we may almost see the implacable hatred and spirit of revenge with which Satan himself is inflamed against Jesus Christ. So also the studious endeavor of the Freemasons to destroy the chief foundation of justice and honesty, and to cooperate with those who would wish, as if they were animals, to do what they please, tends only to the ignominious and disgraceful ruin of the human race.

In the face of such flagrant, far-reaching, and disastrous assaults the Holy Father understood quite keenly the need to mount a strong resistance; as such, he sets forth the following remedial program “for the extirpation of this foul plague which is creeping through the veins of the body politic.” First and foremost he counseled exposure, exhorting his readers to “tear away the mask of Freemasonry, and to let it be seen as it really is” (31). This was to be achieved by primarily through preaching and publication, but also by the promotion of virtuous organizations such as Catholic schools (36) religious guilds for workmen (35), and Third Order lay associations (34).

Yet above and beyond all these efforts the pope called especially for prayer, recognizing “that our united labors will by no means suffice to pluck up these pernicious seeds from the Lord’s field, unless the Heavenly Master of the vineyard shall mercifully help us in our endeavors.” To this end, the Holy Father closes his encyclical on a hopeful note trusting that, in so far as the Church perseveres in prayer, so will she be delivered her from her enemies.

It’s an altogether brilliant exhortation, which not only exposes Freemasonry’s plans, but also sets forth the appropriate tactical countermeasures; and yet its inherent vulnerability lies in the danger of alerting the opposition respecting how and where they ought to strike; for to the degree the Church is strengthened by a renewal of prayer, so too is she compromised by its corruption. A simple maxim, but nevertheless staggering in its implications for the integrity of the Church’s most powerful and essential prayer. Thus, if it was made painstakingly obvious that the Magisterium must, above all else, safeguard the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, it was no less evident that – should a spirit of liturgical revolution ever succeed in masquerading as source of renewal – it would signal a decisive conquest for the enemies of the Church.

And so it has.

An important question remains unanswered; namely, how would the Devil ever attain such power? Efforts at infiltration notwithstanding, it seems only fitting that God would nevertheless place special protections around the Church’s supreme and existential act of worship. In light of this reality, it is therefore reasonable to conclude that should such a masterstroke ever successfully fall, it could only occur in an era when Satan had been granted unprecedented license by God himself in his designs to destroy the Church.

Which brings us to our fourth point, and the truly frightening vision of Pope Leo XIII in which he reportedly witnessed the unfolding of exactly this scenario:

October 13, 1884, Pope Leo XIII had just finished celebrating Mass in a chapel in the Vatican. At the Mass were a few Cardinals and members of the household staff. Suddenly the Pope stopped at the foot of the altar. He stood there for about 10 minutes, as if in a trance, his face ashen white. Then going straightway from the Chapel to his office, he composed the prayer to St. Michael and later issued instructions that it be said after all Low Masses everywhere in the world. He explained that, as he was about to leave the foot of the altar, he had suddenly heard voices – two voices, one kind and gentle, the other guttural and harsh. There he heard the voice of Satan in his pride, boasting to Our Lord: “I can destroy your Church.” The gentle voice of Our Lord: “You can? Then go ahead and do so.” Satan replied, “To do so, I need more time and more power.” The Lord said, “How much time? How much power?” “75 to 100 years, and a greater power over those who will give themselves over to my service.” was Satan’s reply. Mysteriously our Lord said, “You have the time, you have the power. Do with them what you will.”

While there are several permutations of this story in circulation, the most frequently cited authorities are the 1946 Pastoral Letter of Cardinal Nasalli Rocca, and the eyewitness testimony of Fr. Domenico Pechenino, first recorded in the Italian journal La Settimana del Clero (those who would seek to discredit this last attestation due to its affiliation with the Society of St. Pius X need also to recognize that this source is unique in providing authentic translations from the original documents). What these accounts make clear, especially in the absence of evidence discrediting their veracity, is that there is good reason to conclude that Pope Leo’s vision actually took place; more importantly, the vision itself offers good reason to conclude that the 20th century would witness a diabolical assault on the Church unlike any she had previously known.

To this end, if St. John Paul II is correct in proclaiming that the Holy Eucharist is the “source and summit of the Faith,” it stands to reason that those attempting to effect its demise would seek to undermine the very ritual given for its manifestation and exaltation. And even though such an attack could never entirely compromise the validity of the Eucharistic consecration, it may nevertheless achieve a degree of distortion so pronounced that it effectively obscures these Sacred Mysteries from all but keenest (or most pious) observers.

Is it any wonder then that today more than 60% of American Catholics deny the reality of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist? It shouldn’t be. The conclusion is obvious: when the Church ceases acting as if Christ is truly and substantially present in the Blessed Sacrament, the faithful stop believing that Christ is truly and substantially present in the Blessed Sacrament. This creates a vicious cycle: as belief begins to falter, praxis suffers further. Why else do we tolerate banal sanctuaries cluttered with laity, communion in the hand, indecent attire, rank irreverence, awful music, and unrestricted chatter in church? The list of abuses common in our era is lengthy, but the answer to why they persist is always the same: there is among Catholics today a widespread and practical apostasy from the central miraculous dogma of the Mass; that is, we no longer believe that the Eucharist is God Himself, veiled in hidden majesty, made present so that we may worship and adore Him; and consequently, we blithely construct liturgies which forsake the First Commandment while emphasizing shallow and insipid ways to amuse or gratify ourselves.

Excepting of course, the Church’s ultimate indefectibility, if left unchecked, these efforts can only move us ever closer to the stated end of Freemasonry; namely, “the destruction forever of Catholicism and even of the Christian idea.” Again, this is because the Mass is the Church’s existential act of worship. She depends upon it for her very existence, and thus the measure of its destruction will be the measure of her demise.

For some, it may be difficult to concede that the Church could stray so far afield, especially when it seems that her own Council ultimately acted as the catalyst; but when we recall that the popes repeatedly warned of a Masonic plot to destroy the Faith; that known Masons went on to disclose their intent to fundamentally transform the Mass at an Ecumenical Council; that even before their existence as a society, Our Lady prophesied that Masons – “shortly after the middle of the 20th century” – would besiege all seven sacraments; that both the Mass and the sacraments did in fact find themselves dramatically altered “shortly after the middle of the 20th century”; and that all this should occur precisely during an era when Satan had been granted unparalleled power to assault the Church; when we consider all these things together with the fact that a compromised Mass is the surest way to destroy the Faith, suddenly the specter of a revolutionary coup cloaked in the guise of conciliar renewal is brought into sharp and disturbing relief.

Those who have eyes let them see.

It is vital for us to understand how these most recent developments came to pass. In the next and final installment, we will once more consider both the prevailing zeitgeist that so strongly influenced the era of Vatican II, and those things which followed in its wake.

Originally published on April 20, 2015.

28 thoughts on “Revolution in Tiara and Cope: A History of Church Infiltration (II)”

  1. Hi Brian,

    I hate to keep sounding like the “check is in the mail” guy about my reply to part 1, but I know you appreciate a careful if slightly delayed reply, and last night I decided to add just a little more to the post.

    Meanwhile, do you consider the following to be a fair summary of your argument?

    Modernist [Masonic, Marxist, Zionist, etc.] infiltrators are boldly attempting to use the structure of the Catholic Church for their own false religion. The precise problem facing the Catholic Church is that heretics have, by canonically legal means, infiltrated positions of the hierarchy, and are promoting a false religion as if it were the Catholic Faith. If they had separated from the Catholic Church, as the Lutherans did, their position vis-à-vis the Catholic Church would be very clear, and there would be no crisis in the Church.

    Reply
    • Yes, I would say that’s a relatively fair summary. Although I would maintain that while they certainly WANT to promote a false religion, the degree to which they’ve been successful in this endeavor is open for discussion. However, whatever they’ve achieved, as I said before, I do not believe it amounts to, or ever could amount to, a defection. Instead, I think it amounts primarily to confusion and an overall weakening of the Church’s mission. It’s a sickness; but while the Bride of Christ may be sick, she isn’t terminal. Thus, my intent with this series of essays is to help arouse the antibodies that will successfully fight the infection.

      Reply
      • Brian, please tell us just what, in your opinion, would have to happen for you to admit the overwhelming majority of the hierarchy and the popes after Vatican II have defected?

        Reply
        • The Church, possibly at some later date, would have to determine, by means of lawful ecclesiastical inquiry, that a given pope and/or certain members of the hierarchy were found to be guilty of the crime of manifest heresy.

          Reply
          • I’ve been asked by Steve to refrain from expressing what I truly believe but thank you for replying to my question.
            I am confused though as to how it would be possible that a “lawful ecclesiastical inquiry” to occur if the pope and magisterium had all defected. That would be like asking the criminal to judge himself.

          • But don’t you have eyes to see with and ears to hear with?
            Well done articles but I’m not sure how you can ‘square’ all you understand and continue to refer to Wojtyla and Roncalli as ‘saint’.

            Roncalli (aka Angelo ‘Nikital Roncalli) had been under suspicion of being a ‘modernist’ and it was reported that he was a member of the Order of Rosicrucians, while serving as the Vatican’s Charge d’Affairs in Paris 1935. There is too much more to place in a comment:

            Just prior to his death, John XXIII composed the following prayer for the Jews. This prayer was confirmed by the Vatican as being the work of John XXIII. (He insisted they were still the ‘chosen people’)
            “We realize today how blind we have been throughout the centuries and how we did not appreciate the beauty of the Chosen People or the features of our favored brothers. We are aware of the divine mark of Cain placed upon our forehead. In the course of centuries our brother, Abel, has been lying bleeding and in tears on the ground through our fault, only because we had forgotten Thy love. Forgive us our unjustified condemnation of the Jews. Forgive us that by crucifying them we have crucified You for the second time. Forgive us. We did not know what we were doing.”

            Among the lowlights of Wojtyla’s non-pontificate are what he did at Assisi, what he did at the Roman Fort Antonia, also known as ‘the wailing wall’ (I’m surprised he didn’t include a little ‘davening’ with the Shekinah) and the infamous kissing of the koran.
            Wojtyla also stated many times that man is his own creator and redeemer: “By His incarnation Christ has united Himself in some fashion with every man.. » (Gaudium et Spes 22, 2)
            Redemptor Hominis (# 13), March 4, 1979: “We are dealing with each man, for each one is included in the mystery of the Redemption and with each one Christ has united Himself forever through this mystery.”
            Bingo! Universal salvation!

            Then, the adoration of man:
            Vatican II document, Gaudium et Spes # 26: “There is also increasing awareness of the exceptional dignity which belongs to the human person, who is superior to everything and whose rights and duties are universal and inviolable.”

            Vatican II document, Gaudium et Spes # 12: “According to the almost unanimous opinion of believers and unbelievers alike, all things on earth should be related to man as their center and crown.”

          • Please don’t add to the confusion.

            To be declared “saint” is not a seal of approval of the Church on all a person wrote or did… It’s simply the Church confirming a person as a model and intercessor, plus it’s normally based on God’s testimony (miracles).

            JPII gave his life for the Church, didn’t quit as the other guy (still love him though!) and upheld the Church’s teaching. He’s a father figure to a whole generation of Catholics. He was leagues above Pope Francis.

            Although I never agreed with JPII’s philosophy, theology of the body and other theological research… I still pray him.

            On the other hand, I shudder when I think of PF eternal destiny. We should pray for him. He’s an example of what could happen to any of us if we were to refuse God’s free gifts.

        • Yeah, IANS has done so but when he is prompted to sign in for a comment, IANS sometimes hits the wrong button and ends-up with an old discarded s/n such as Mighty Joe Young or Bornacatholic.

          O, and the third person thing first started out as a lark but has now become, IANS supposes, a vulture hovering over the dead rhetorical carrion of the third person carrying on that he does.

          Still, all you have to do is read some of what IANS writes whereas he has to live as IANS 24/7/365 so, cut him some slack 🙂

          Reply
  2. Those who have eyes let them see.

    Read “The Problems With The Prayers of the Modern (Novus Ordo) Mass” by Rev. Anthony Cekada.

    Read “The Destruction of the Christian Tradition (1981); “The Problems With The New Mass: A Brief Overview of the Major Theological Difficulties Inherent in the Novus Ordo Missae (1990); and “The Problem With the Other Sacraments available online through http://www.traditio.com, by Rama P. Coomaraswamy, M.D.

    Read the series of booklets written by Fr. Francisco Radecki, CMRI and Fr. Dominic Radecki, CMRI about Vatican II, particularly “The Popes of Vatican II” and one can reach no other conclusion than they are heretics.

    The Satanic forces that are Masonry, Modernism, Marxism, Communism, Liberalism, Progressivism, and Radical Feminisim/Homosexuality gathered together within the Second Vatican II Council and the results are plain to those who have eyes. A new religion was created. An anti-God, anti-Catholic religion so diabolical that it has effectively closed the minds and hearts of millions of Catholics to the Truth of Christ and if they don’t see the Light before their life upon this earth ends, they will be damned to eternal Hell.

    Reply
  3. The intent is to infiltrate the Church and destroy it; they would never have separated from the Catholic Church. We saw a classic example of the desecration at the Papal Mass in Manila; their Cardinal said nothing, he is one of the progressives.

    Reply
  4. Dear Mr. Miles. IANS is loving this series and he wants to drop this info into the mix;

    In 1948, both Cardinal Ruffini and Cardinal Ottaviani identified several doctrinal points requiring clarification and they also identified a heap of errors and they did that during the reign of Pope Pius XII and they requested he call a Council but owing to differing opinions re the Council PPXII set aside the idea.

    Then, during the Conclave that elected him, he who took the name, Pope John 23rd ,was visited in his cell, on the eve of the election, by Cardinal Ruffini and Caridnal Ottaviani who, again, requested a Council to deal with pressing issues

    This has been routinely documented in many places, perhaps the most recent in Prof Mattei’s, “The Second Vatican Council, an untold story,” (pages 95-97).

    And isn’t it interesting that the work of Pope John 23rd’s Roman Synod was so solid and orthodox a year or two prior to the opening of Vatican Two but then evaporated – up into the noosphere, one supposes.

    O, and forget not that the speech that opened the council was written by the Pope-waiting-in-the-wings, Abp Montini of Milano.

    Reply
      • Are you of the opinion that the request for a council by the two Cardinals was scotched owing to Pope Pius XII’s support for the centralising and liberalising and substantial changes he advanced rather than, as it is usually assumed, that he was fearful of such?

        The two great Cardinals were alert and prepared for battle against the multivariate heresies/tendencies then in ascendancy throughout the church.

        It may have been the case that he thought the advance of the ideology of a new church had not yet solidified within the Bishopric and, thus, an ecumenical council could threaten what “must ” be done to bring us into line with the great changes occurring elsewhere in the world.

        Ah, who knows…

        Reply
  5. Presented with such dire assessment of the origin and reach of the revolutionaries, too many Catholics are wont to cite Sacred Scripture’s guarantee against Hell’s gates prevailing. While that’s a justifiable response, I wonder what they take that to mean. Does it relieve them of a sense of duty to expose these machinations when confronted with them? Do they think uttering that biblical passage with enough frequency will mitigate the effects of these plots? …or inoculate themselves against (gasp!) “radical traditionalism”?

    I, for one, take it to mean (especially in light of Pope St. Leo’s supernatural encounter & the tone other apocalyptic teaching in Scripture) that towards the end (read: now) our infernal enemy will finally have every means allowed to his corrupted nature to defeat Christians. Even the help of angelic patronage over nations will recede. The disintegration would eventually extinguish the Faith worldwide (yes, even among “recalcitrant” traditionalists!), if God Himself did not act to shorten those days.

    It’s a promise to intervene, not to spare. Unfortunately, there are a TON of good-willed, rightly concerned, self-ID’ing “conservative” Catholics who believe the latter. They will cling to “sparing illusion” until so much cognitive dissonance between their ideals and Rome’s locally implemented directives suffocates their faith – snuffed out with nary a whimper. Which isn’t to say they’ll leave the Church; they’ll just interiorly apostatize and soften to all the anthropocentric claptrap. That’s not exactly a recipe for sticking out uncomfortably in a parish. Comfort WILL prevail over them.

    Christ was in the tomb THREE DAYS before the Providential nature of His Passion was made manifest to human senses. If people are counting on the Later Day Apostasy to challenge Christian Faith any less, they’ve got another thing coming.

    Reply
  6. Much as one might like and agree with the content of the purported Our Lady of Good Success private revelations, the approved OL of Good Success devotion is clearly to an image of Our Lady. The available information suggests the locutions may be a forgery. I have tried to find any information about the locutions from a Catholic Church source and looked in vain. I even tried asking someone who was going there on a TLM pilgrimage to please try to find something from an official source, hopefully diocesan, with information and history on the locutions, but unfortunately they never got back to me. I am still

    Reply
  7. Read Windswept House by Malachi Martin to see how far the synagogue of satan (freemasons, etc) have gotten into the Church. Recall Pope Paul VI the smoke of satan has entered the Church. Smoke obscures, it makes things hard to see. Sounds like what comes out of Synods today, doesn’t it?

    Reply
  8. Bingo! “The conclusion is obvious: when the Church ceases acting as if Christ is truly and substantially present in the Blessed Sacrament, the faithful stop believing that Christ is truly and substantially present in the Blessed Sacrament. This creates a vicious cycle: as belief begins to falter, praxis suffers further.”

    Reply
  9. QUOTE: Is it any wonder then that today more than 60% of American Catholics deny the reality of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist? It shouldn’t be.

    No wonder the alarm some (such as 1P5) have rung over Francis latest exhortation – that it has gained little traction among pew-sitting Catholics. Why should it? What was expected? Why the concern about some receiving Communion wrongly (even in sin) when 60% of polled Catholics do not even believe it is the Real Body & Blood Christ? But something other – the Bread & Blood self-itentified by self-identifiers! So what’s the big deal?

    It’s like the parish church across town (we’re talking about an honest-to-goodness church in a swanky district in an American city) which *proudly* displays it 80% plus LGBTQ(ABC) parishioners. One can only ask, how many of them, on any Sunday morning, crawl out from their gay stained sheets to trudge to the local parish around the corner – to taste and see (apparently) that the Lord (and the Father’s holy wrath) doesn’t give a rip over what they on Saturday night.

    If all this going on,if such a critical mass percentage of Catholic disbelieve in he Real Presence, why is anyone – for goodness sake – getting all bothered and up in arms over Pope Francis pulling Church practice (at least, that) into line with the behavior of self-identifying Catholics? Heck, isn’t the point of going to Church so that God can take his selfie with us! Anything less would be a disrespect and an offense; anything less than that than God would be violating the safety rules of our safe zones. The first, the #1 rule: no one is refused entry, and God cannot refuse any requested selfie.

    So, even before Pope Francis released his exhortation all was lost. The document’s effects were already in play before it was even read!. Nothing has changed – except, maybe, the polled 60% (of disbelief) has now been bumped to 80.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popular on OnePeterFive

Share to...