Sidebar
Browse Our Articles & Podcasts

Full Text of Pope Francis’ Congressional Address

2015-09-24_10-35-58
The following is the prepared text of the speech delivered today.

Mr. Vice-President,

Mr. Speaker,

Honorable Members of Congress,

Dear Friends,

I am most grateful for your invitation to address this Joint Session of Congress in “the land of the free and the home of the brave”.  I would like to think that the reason for this is that I too am a son of this great continent, from which we have all received so much and toward which we share a common responsibility.

Each son or daughter of a given country has a mission, a personal and social responsibility. Your own responsibility as members of Congress is to enable this country, by your legislative activity, to grow as a nation.  You are the face of its people, their representatives.  You are called to defend and preserve the dignity of your fellow citizens in the tireless and demanding pursuit of the common good, for this is the chief aim of all politics.  A political society endures when it seeks, as a vocation, to satisfy common needs by stimulating the growth of all its members, especially those in situations of greater vulnerability or risk. Legislative activity is always based on care for the people.  To this you have been invited, called and convened by those who elected you.

Yours is a work which makes me reflect in two ways on the figure of Moses.  On the one hand, the patriarch and lawgiver of the people of Israel symbolizes the need of peoples to keep alive their sense of unity by means of just legislation.  On the other, the figure of Moses leads us directly to God and thus to the transcendent dignity of the human being.  Moses provides us with a good synthesis of your work: you are asked to protect, by means of the law, the image and likeness fashioned by God on every human face.

Today I would like not only to address you, but through you the entire people of the United States. Here, together with their representatives, I would like to take this opportunity to dialogue with the many thousands of men and women who strive each day to do an honest day’s work, to bring home their daily bread, to save money and –one step at a time – to build a better life for their families.  These are men and women who are not concerned simply with paying their taxes, but in their own quiet way sustain the life of society.  They generate solidarity by their actions, and they create organizations which offer a helping hand to those most in need.

I would also like to enter into dialogue with the many elderly persons who are a storehouse of wisdom forged by experience, and who seek in many ways, especially through volunteer work, to share their stories and their insights.  I know that many of them are retired, but still active; they keep working to build up this land.  I also want to dialogue with all those young people who are working to realize their great and noble aspirations, who are not led astray by facile proposals, and who face difficult situations, often as a result of immaturity on the part of many adults.  I wish to dialogue with all of you, and I would like to do so through the historical memory of your people.

My visit takes place at a time when men and women of good will are marking the anniversaries of several great Americans.  The complexities of history and the reality of human weakness notwithstanding, these men and women, for all their many differences and limitations, were able by hard work and self-sacrifice – some at the cost of their lives – to build a better future.  They shaped fundamental values which will endure forever in the spirit of the American people.  A people with this spirit can live through many crises, tensions and conflicts, while always finding the resources to move forward, and to do so with dignity.   These men and women offer us a way of seeing and interpreting reality.  In honoring their memory, we are inspired, even amid conflicts, and in the here and now of each day, to draw upon our deepest cultural reserves.

I would like to mention four of these Americans: Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Dorothy Day and Thomas Merton.

This year marks the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, the guardian of liberty, who labored tirelessly that “this nation, under God, [might] have a new birth of freedom”.  Building a future of freedom requires love of the common good and cooperation in a spirit of subsidiarity and solidarity.

All of us are quite aware of, and deeply worried by, the disturbing social and political situation of the world today.  Our world is increasingly a place of violent conflict, hatred and brutal atrocities, committed even in the name of God and of religion.  We know that no religion is immune from forms of individual delusion or ideological extremism.  This means that we must be especially attentive to every type of fundamentalism, whether religious or of any other kind.  A delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual freedoms.  But there is another temptation which we must especially guard against: the simplistic reductionism which sees only good or evil; or, if you will, the righteous and sinners.  The contemporary world, with its open wounds which affect so many of our brothers and sisters, demands that we confront every form of polarization which would divide it into these two camps.  We know that in the attempt to be freed of the enemy without, we can be tempted to feed the enemy within.  To imitate the hatred and violence of tyrants and murderers is the best way to take their place.  That is something which you, as a people, reject.

Our response must instead be one of hope and healing, of peace and justice.  We are asked to summon the courage and the intelligence to resolve today’s many geopolitical and economic crises.  Even in the developed world, the effects of unjust structures and actions are all too apparent.  Our efforts must aim at restoring hope, righting wrongs, maintaining commitments, and thus promoting the well-being of individuals and of peoples.  We must move forward together, as one, in a renewed spirit of fraternity and solidarity, cooperating generously for the common good.

The challenges facing us today call for a renewal of that spirit of cooperation, which has accomplished so much good throughout the history of the United States.  The complexity, the gravity and the urgency of these challenges demand that we pool our resources and talents, and resolve to support one another, with respect for our differences and our convictions of conscience.

In this land, the various religious denominations have greatly contributed to building and strengthening society.  It is important that today, as in the past, the voice of faith continue to be heard, for it is a voice of fraternity and love, which tries to bring out the best in each person and in each society.  Such cooperation is a powerful resource in the battle to eliminate new global forms of slavery, born of grave injustices which can be overcome only through new policies and new forms of social consensus.

Here I think of the political history of the United States, where democracy is deeply rooted in the mind of the American people.  All political activity must serve and promote the good of the human person and be based on respect for his or her dignity.  “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (Declaration of Independence, 4 July 1776).  If politics must truly be at the service of the human person, it follows that it cannot be a slave to the economy and finance.  Politics is, instead, an expression of our compelling need to live as one, in order to build as one the greatest common good: that of a community which sacrifices particular interests in order to share, in justice and peace, its goods, its interests, its social life.  I do not underestimate the difficulty that this involves, but I encourage you in this effort.

Here too I think of the march which Martin Luther King led from Selma to Montgomery fifty years ago as part of the campaign to fulfill his “dream” of full civil and political rights for African Americans.  That dream continues to inspire us all.  I am happy that America continues to be, for many, a land of “dreams”.  Dreams which lead to action, to participation, to commitment.  Dreams which awaken what is deepest and truest in the life of a people.

In recent centuries, millions of people came to this land to pursue their dream of building a future in freedom.  We, the people of this continent, are not fearful of foreigners, because most of us were once foreigners.  I say this to you as the son of immigrants, knowing that so many of you are also descended from immigrants.  Tragically, the rights of those who were here long before us were not always respected.  For those peoples and their nations, from the heart of American democracy, I wish to reaffirm my highest esteem and appreciation.  Those first contacts were often turbulent and violent, but it is difficult to judge the past by the criteria of the present.  Nonetheless, when the stranger in our midst appeals to us, we must not repeat the sins and the errors of the past.  We must resolve now to live as nobly and as justly as possible, as we educate new generations not to turn their back on our “neighbors” and everything around us.  Building a nation calls us to recognize that we must constantly relate to others, rejecting a mindset of hostility in order to adopt one of reciprocal subsidiarity, in a constant effort to do our best.  I am confident that we can do this.

Our world is facing a refugee crisis of a magnitude not seen since the Second World War.  This presents us with great challenges and many hard decisions.  On this continent, too, thousands of persons are led to travel north in search of a better life for themselves and for their loved ones, in search of greater opportunities.  Is this not what we want for our own children?  We must not be taken aback by their numbers, but rather view them as persons, seeing their faces and listening to their stories, trying to respond as best we can to their situation.  To respond in a way which is always humane, just and fraternal.  We need to avoid a common temptation nowadays: to discard whatever proves troublesome.  Let us remember the Golden Rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (Mt 7:12).

This Rule points us in a clear direction.  Let us treat others with the same passion and compassion with which we want to be treated.  Let us seek for others the same possibilities which we seek for ourselves.  Let us help others to grow, as we would like to be helped ourselves.  In a word, if we want security, let us give security; if we want life, let us give life; if we want opportunities, let us provide opportunities.  The yardstick we use for others will be the yardstick which time will use for us.  The Golden Rule also reminds us of our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every stage of its development.

This conviction has led me, from the beginning of my ministry, to advocate at different levels for the global abolition of the death penalty.  I am convinced that this way is the best, since every life is sacred, every human person is endowed with an inalienable dignity, and society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes.  Recently my brother bishops here in the United States renewed their call for the abolition of the death penalty.  Not only do I support them, but I also offer encouragement to all those who are convinced that a just and necessary punishment must never exclude the dimension of hope and the goal of rehabilitation.

In these times when social concerns are so important, I cannot fail to mention the Servant of God Dorothy Day, who founded the Catholic Worker Movement.  Her social activism, her passion for justice and for the cause of the oppressed, were inspired by the Gospel, her faith, and the example of the saints.

How much progress has been made in this area in so many parts of the world!  How much has been done in these first years of the third millennium to raise people out of extreme poverty!  I know that you share my conviction that much more still needs to be done, and that in times of crisis and economic hardship a spirit of global solidarity must not be lost.  At the same time I would encourage you to keep in mind all those people around us who are trapped in a cycle of poverty.  They too need to be given hope.  The fight against poverty and hunger must be fought constantly and on many fronts, especially in its causes.  I know that many Americans today, as in the past, are working to deal with this problem.

It goes without saying that part of this great effort is the creation and distribution of wealth.  The right use of natural resources, the proper application of technology and the harnessing of the spirit of enterprise are essential elements of an economy which seeks to be modern, inclusive and sustainable.  “Business is a noble vocation, directed to producing wealth and improving the world.  It can be a fruitful source of prosperity for the area in which it operates, especially if it sees the creation of jobs as an essential part of its service to the common good” (Laudato Si’, 129).  This common good also includes the earth, a central theme of the encyclical which I recently wrote in order to “enter into dialogue with all people about our common home” (ibid., 3).  “We need a conversation which includes everyone, since the environmental challenge we are undergoing, and its human roots, concern and affect us all” (ibid., 14).

In Laudato Si’, I call for a courageous and responsible effort to “redirect our steps” (ibid., 61), and to avert the most serious effects of the environmental deterioration caused by human activity.  I am convinced that we can make a difference and I have no doubt that the United States – and this Congress – have an important role to play.  Now is the time for courageous actions and strategies, aimed at implementing a “culture of care” (ibid., 231) and “an integrated approach to combating poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature” (ibid., 139).  “We have the freedom needed to limit and direct technology” (ibid., 112); “to devise intelligent ways of… developing and limiting our power” (ibid., 78); and to put technology “at the service of another type of progress, one which is healthier, more human, more social, more integral” (ibid., 112).  In this regard, I am confident that America’s outstanding academic and research institutions can make a vital contribution in the years ahead.

A century ago, at the beginning of the Great War, which Pope Benedict XV termed a “pointless slaughter”, another notable American was born: the Cistercian monk Thomas Merton.  He remains a source of spiritual inspiration and a guide for many people.  In his autobiography he wrote: “I came into the world.  Free by nature, in the image of God, I was nevertheless the prisoner of my own violence and my own selfishness, in the image of the world into which I was born.  That world was the picture of Hell, full of men like myself, loving God, and yet hating him; born to love him, living instead in fear of hopeless self-contradictory hungers”.  Merton was above all a man of prayer, a thinker who challenged the certitudes of his time and opened new horizons for souls and for the Church.  He was also a man of dialogue, a promoter of peace between peoples and religions.

From this perspective of dialogue, I would like to recognize the efforts made in recent months to help overcome historic differences linked to painful episodes of the past.  It is my duty to build bridges and to help all men and women, in any way possible, to do the same.  When countries which have been at odds resume the path of dialogue – a dialogue which may have been interrupted for the most legitimate of reasons – new opportunities open up for all.  This has required, and requires, courage and daring, which is not the same as irresponsibility.  A good political leader is one who, with the interests of all in mind, seizes the moment in a spirit of openness and pragmatism.  A good political leader always opts to initiate processes rather than possessing spaces (cf. Evangelii Gaudium, 222-223).

Being at the service of dialogue and peace also means being truly determined to minimize and, in the long term, to end the many armed conflicts throughout our world.  Here we have to ask ourselves: Why are deadly weapons being sold to those who plan to inflict untold suffering on individuals and society?  Sadly, the answer, as we all know, is simply for money: money that is drenched in blood, often innocent blood.  In the face of this shameful and culpable silence, it is our duty to confront the problem and to stop the arms trade.

Three sons and a daughter of this land, four individuals and four dreams: Lincoln, liberty; Martin Luther King, liberty in plurality and non-exclusion; Dorothy Day, social justice and the rights of persons; and Thomas Merton, the capacity for dialogue and openness to God.

Four representatives of the American people.

I will end my visit to your country in Philadelphia, where I will take part in the World Meeting of Families.  It is my wish that throughout my visit the family should be a recurrent theme.  How essential the family has been to the building of this country!  And how worthy it remains of our support and encouragement!  Yet I cannot hide my concern for the family, which is threatened, perhaps as never before, from within and without.  Fundamental relationships are being called into question, as is the very basis of marriage and the family.  I can only reiterate the importance and, above all, the richness and the beauty of family life.

In particular, I would like to call attention to those family members who are the most vulnerable, the young.  For many of them, a future filled with countless possibilities beckons, yet so many others seem disoriented and aimless, trapped in a hopeless maze of violence, abuse and despair.  Their problems are our problems.  We cannot avoid them.  We need to face them together, to talk about them and to seek effective solutions rather than getting bogged down in discussions.  At the risk of oversimplifying, we might say that we live in a culture which pressures young people not to start a family, because they lack possibilities for the future.  Yet this same culture presents others with so many options that they too are dissuaded from starting a family.

A nation can be considered great when it defends liberty as Lincoln did, when it fosters a culture which enables people to “dream” of full rights for all their brothers and sisters, as Martin Luther King sought to do; when it strives for justice and the cause of the oppressed, as Dorothy Day did by her tireless work, the fruit of a faith which becomes dialogue and sows peace in the contemplative style of Thomas Merton.

In these remarks I have sought to present some of the richness of your cultural heritage, of the spirit of the American people.  It is my desire that this spirit continue to develop and grow, so that as many young people as possible can inherit and dwell in a land which has inspired so many people to dream.

God bless America!

(Text provided courtesy of Vatican Radio)

40 thoughts on “Full Text of Pope Francis’ Congressional Address”

  1. Thanks for posting this, Steve. Like Martin Luther King Jr.,, I, too, had a dream: that Pope Francis would’ve spoken as passionately to those who made same-sex marriage the law of the land (they were sitting right in front of him for crying out loud!) & the murder of the preborn, as he’s spoken about capitalism being “the dung of the devil” or against those who don’t recycle or who use air conditioning. No doubt, the catholic media are busy spinning the web otherwise, and it’s only going to add to the confusion…

    Reply
  2. “I can only reiterate the importance and, above all, the richness and the beauty of family life.” – Pope Francis

    Only? Why? America has willingly disposed of the “beautiful”. We have become enamored of the ugly, and we export our surplus the world over. Ugliness is the new “beauty”. Save your breath for excoriating the purveyors of ugliness and death, their powerful accomplices, and us, their willful dupes. The rest is straw.

    Reply
  3. It reads like a speech written by speechwriters, with Franciscan injections here and there to give the sense of authenticity. Which is not a bad thing, since Catholics are thoroughly familiar with the confusion that can result when the Holy Father writes in his own words or speaks off the cuff.

    But otherwise, it’s about what you expect: No abortion holocaust, no Obergefell, ritual genuflections to St. Martin of Selma et al, false ecumenism, etc. And of course, no Jesus Christ.

    But I have to confess that I was tickled by this bit:

    We need to face [the problems of the young] together, to talk about them and to seek effective solutions rather than getting bogged down in discussions.

    So we need to talk about problems but not get bogged down in discussions. Got it.

    Reply
  4. You know I was looking for a bunch of “Oh no he di’ints” But I didn’t see much. So I was initially relieved and a bit urked that he didn’t put his foot in his mouth. Just expectations I guess. But then just now I realized in the days leading up to the Cuba and America Tour de Force FrancisChurch Style, the Pope not only sometimes says a whole bunch of crazy stuff, but also has a way of NOT saying many things he should. This latter way is what I have seen lately. To have that sort of stage and babykitty-foot around real, horrifying evil and real brimstone obtaining sin…….. Plus Merton, Day, Junior and Lincoln? Bummer man. Bummer.

    Reply
  5. Hardly a stem-winder. But, if you are a Democrat pol, especially a Catholic Democrat pol, you have at least the assurance that not one word of this can ever be thrown back in your face…because there isn’t really much here. Conservatives or those opposed to wide-open borders? Well, not so lucky, that crowd.

    The reliably sycophant “moderate” and “conservative” Catholic media will scrub this for any crumbs indicating papal displeasure with America’s pervasive current Sodom & Gomorrah shtick and, armed with a little luck and an expansive imagination, they may even find some. The trouble is they are all written in code, far too subtle for the minds of our legislators, and even less accessible to the minds of a nation addicted to bimbo-television.

    The rest of the media including all the CINO publications and websites, will have an easier time when sifting the speech for nuggets that underpin their peculiar Weltanschaaung. There’s plenty in here for envirozealots and private wealth redistributors as well as for the one-worlder crowd.

    It is all quite depressing but there is often a silver lining even in the darkest cloud, and that’s the case here too. A speech this jejune is likely to attract few readers beyond the partisans I mention above. Once the furor on the Left dies down, it will have little further effect.

    Reply
  6. BLECCH. Maria Shriver: “Before Francis, It Was ‘Embarrassing’ to Enter Your Catholic Church.” Enough material to spin every which way to Sunday. Crumbs to pro-lifers, banquet to all the rest. Faithful Catholic outlets putting best face on it, but this will be disastrous.

    Reply
  7. I am not surprised, but sorely disappointed that the Pope, the leader of the Catholic Church, tip toed around abortion and did not address the evil it embodies.

    Reply
  8. This speech is full of ambiguities and contradictory “solutions”
    which have nothing to do with the teaching of Christ. From my reading it seems the proposed solutions to grave evils focus
    on dialogue and consensus, rather then supernatural grace. Christ wasn’t
    mentioned once! Here’s an example of this: “Such cooperation is a powerful
    resource in the battle to eliminate new global forms of slavery, born of grave
    injustices which can be overcome only through new policies and new forms of
    social consensus.” ONLY
    through new policies and social consensus? How does one reach a consensus on
    the grave evil of abortion, when the two views are diametrically opposed and
    one side is advocating grave evil?
    Isn’t this exactly where we find ourselves today in the pro-life
    movement? Did you notice too that at the end, in reference to the problems
    faced by young people, dialogue isn’t the answer? “We need to face them
    together, to talk about them and to seek effective solutions rather than
    getting bogged down in discussions. “ We need to solve the problem by talk
    about them but not get bogged down in discussions? Isn’t talking a form of discussion? What? This speech also so
    ambiguous, it could satisfy many opposing ideologies who could interrupt and
    spin it to their advantage and I’m sure they will. We need Christ and His supernatural grace and you’d think
    the head of the church Christ He founded, might actually mention His name and recommend
    recourse to Him a much more demonstrative way! This is beyond disappointing, it’s
    deeply troubling.

    Reply
  9. This was Pope Francis’ one chance to address the entire nation and its lawmakers. Outside of a vague reference, abortion was never mentioned. At a time when we are murdering 3,000 babies a day, this is simply appalling. This is especially true in light of the PP revelations.

    Reply
  10. Here’s a secular perspective on the pope’s speech, from the blogger Ace of Spades (my emphasis in bold):

    For some time, I’ve heard conservative Catholics defend the Pope by saying that the left amplifies and celebrates the Pope’s left-leaning cant, but ignores the things that appeal to traditionalists.

    The problem with that is that while he does occasionally say things that appeal to traditionalists, he rarely says them, as if he’s obligated to say such things as the cost of getting to talk about what he really wants to talk about, which is Income Inequality and Global Warming.

    Today’s performance is further evidence of that.

    Yes, he made an allusion to abortion, not daring to speak it by name, and similarly made the vaguest allusion to gay marriage (not actually even taking a stance on it).

    Then he yammered for long stretches about Nancy Pelosi’s agenda.

    I’ve tried to not speak much about the Pope due to 1, respect for my Catholic readers, 2, my complete lack of knowledge of the sorts of things Popes typically say, and 3, generally not caring, but it seems impossible at this point to continue to indulge the optimistic wishcasting of right-leaning Catholics that Francis is merely “complex” and sometimes “misunderstood.”

    I think we understand him just fine.

    I have come to the same conclusion: yes, Pope Francis will once in a while drop a mention of (e.g.) the indissolubility of marriage, or the sanctity of life, or the evils of “gender ideology”, or the existence of the devil (though it’s entirely unclear what harm the devil can do, in the pope’s perspective), but he usually does so in a brief, almost pro forma fashion, as if it’s a line someone else wrote for him to maintain a certain level of Catholic content.

    But when he gets going on a subject dear to his heart, he tends to go on at great length, with all the idiosyncratic phrases and concepts that a person tends to use when he’s speaking on a favorite personal topic.

    It’s really difficult to believe, at this point, that the pope really cares about abortion at all. He behaves as if it’s a nuisance issue that requires the occasional mouthing of certain sentiments, but which needs no special attention. And that is a really worrying perspective for the Vicar of Christ.

    Reply
    • “The problem with that is that while he does occasionally say things that appeal to traditionalists, he rarely says them, as if he’s obligated to say such things as the cost of getting to talk about what he really wants to talk about, which is Income Inequality and Global Warming.”

      THIS is exactly the thing. He’d lose credibility if he never made any Catholic touchpoints, so they’re there. And the poor desperate mass of Catholic who want so badly to see him in an orthodox light fight over scraps from the table, not realizing they’re being played.

      I’m glad someone else said it. I alluded to this in my other post today.

      Reply
    • Sad to see that even secular bloggers who have merely a passing interest in things Catholic can see what most Catholic commentators miss entirely.

      Reply
    • But one can see why this is precisely the sort of Pope many cardinals (and bishops) might like, because it more or less describes many of them, too.

      It does make it more of a wonder that Benedict XVI was ever elected, however.

      Reply
  11. The Pope just gave a State of the Union Address designed to offend no one but the American right, such as it is. Who is this man, and what have we done to deserve the punishment of this absurd pontificate?

    He flies over here on his chartered jet with a vast entourage and then lectures the common man on reducing his carbon footprint. He spends, or causes to be expended, millions of dollars on another useless trip to dispense bromides he could have sent via his Twitter account, and then pulls up in a specially modified Cinquecento few of us could afford to show us how frugal he is. He demands open borders only to return to a Vatican city state with the world’s most restrictive immigration policy.

    On and on this circus goes, with Francis and the world that exploits him loving every minute of the show. “It’s very entertaining to be Pope.” That’s what he told his cardinal friend. It should be his motto in Latin.

    The Church is under the tyrannical rule of a Pope who acts like the dictator of a banana republic. God help us.

    Reply
    • If there’s one faint silver lining around this very dark cloud, it’s that the pope’s speeches on this trip have been banal, anodyne, and above all drearily (and predictably) predictable. Unlike Mother Teresa’s address to the US Congress, or Solzhenitsyn’s Harvard Commencement Address, there’s no content that anyone will remember a few days from now. We certainly won’t be quote-mining them for years to come.

      Reply
    • Dear Mr. Ferrara. IANS has always enjoyed your way with words but here, your words may be just waywards.

      Think of this speech as containing both good and bad.

      The good:

      Our Pope and Our Cross took note of Moses who was the first Inquisitor (Yay, Inquisition) and who in two days killed 47,000 men, women and children included (Exodus 32, Numbers 25) , whereas in over 250 years the Spanish Inquisition only iced, roughly, 3000. (see Edward Peters, non-Catholic, “Inquisition”, Univ California Press).

      The seems to me that Moses is jake with Franciscus, and, thus, we Catholics had just cause to do what he did.

      The Bad

      He mentioned Moses but not Jesus.

      He is the Vicar of Christ,not Moses, whose covenant has been superseded. The new Covenant remains, right?

      Reply
      • No, he is not the Vicar of Christ as both his own word and manifest deed have already judged his heresy. In so doing, he cut himself of from the office or, more likely, never assumed the office in the first place. To deny those facts is simply willful blindness. True Catholics must come together during this apostasy and reject this man.

        Reply
        • Dear OpenMinded. IANS knows many think that way, he doesn’t.

          You prolly know the internet has innumerable seemingly legitimate appeals to declaring a Pope a heretic but that just invites innumerable more questions about material and formal heresy and pertinacity in such a heresy etc

          Reply
          • Do you have a basis for not thinking that way or is it just your gut feeling? Your seeming objection is: that raises several questions, therefore we can dismiss. That’s weak. It’s worth asking the questions and seeking the answer. Our souls depend upon it.

            The heresy issue is often made more complex than needed. A person is not considered part of the Church if they have received the laver of regeneration and publicly profess (word/deed) the true faith. (Pius XII, Mystici Corporis Christi). The Catholic Church essentially looks at a baptized individual like this: (a) heretic or (b) not a heretic. The main issue is whether a person knows of a dogma and rejects it. That’s the question. And it’s without question that some of the most basic and known articles of faith are openly rejected by Jorge.

            That level of heresy is met and exceeded both in word and deed. He rejects Outside the Church. He rejects the necessity of Christ. He says there can be holiness without Christ. He participates in false worship. He esteems false religions such as Islam and Judaism. He rejects the notion that Catholics should try to convert others. What more do you really need?

            “It is absurd to imaginge that he who is outside can command in the Church” Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum.

          • If a Pope is not only determined to serve Satan but can be considered his hands on earth – doing satan’s work- would he still have authority over you?

            Yes,IANS is leading you into a sort of quicksand 🙂

    • ^a compelling example of the wonder and astonishment that people will experience as they watch an extension of the beast in action. I mean, seriously, what more does this man have to do to prove he is a non-Catholic heretic?

      *Knock knock*

      Hello?

      Hey Chris, Jorge here. Was in the neighborhood, thought I’d drop by.

      Uhh, wow, ok. Good to…errr… see you.

      Chris, I’ve been reading a lot of your articles and comments about me. You seemed pretty confused about what’s going on.

      Well, yeah, I mean I don’t understand why you are saying, writing, and doing the things you’re doing that really seem to go against the Faith.

      It’s because I’m not Catholic, Chris.

      Oh.

      When the blind lead the blind, Chris, you know where they end up.

      The ditch?

      Yes. Hey, speaking of which, I have something really cool to show you. Come with me.

      *End Scene*

      Wake up Chris. And everyone else too.

      Reply
  12. A true leader, Mother Teresa address to National Prayer Breakfast mentions Jesus 26 times, and FOCUSES that all else fails in a call to PEACE if we accept a mother can kill even her own child:

    “But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?”

    http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/abortion/catholic-teaching/blessed-mother-teresa-on-abortion/

    Reply
  13. You guys have read Pacem in Terris right? You witnessed Assisi I,II,III right? You saw St. JPII kiss the Koran and ask St. John the Baptist to “protect” Islam right. Honestly,the question I have, is why are you all surprised?

    Reply
    • You saw St. JPII kiss the Koran and ask St. John the Baptist to “protect” Islam right. Honestly,the question I have, is why are you all surprised?
      *
      That God makes saints out of sinners?

      Reply
    • I’m pretty sure I wasn’t surprised–hence, referring to his speeches as predictably predictable–but I was hoping to be surprised. But, unsurprisingly, I was not surprised that I wasn’t surprised.

      Reply
  14. Another robin spotted this morning in this bleak winter of no contentment. Over at catholiccuture.org, the reliably sycophantic site run by Jeff Mirus, there is today a second column of criticism directed at Francis in as many days by Phil Lawler. (Don’t get excited. It’s not heavy duty detergent, but it clearly indicates malaise on Lawler’s part.) In fact, Mirus himself felt compelled to write a wishful-thinking piece yesterday about how important and revealing was the pope’s surprise visit to the Little Sisters of the Poor; when there is little good news, you hype even the little things, I guess. But these articles are important, nonetheless, for they indicate a breach in the heretofore solid phalanx of support for this liberal pope among middle-of-the-road Catholic media. Catholics, even those who write professionally about religious topics, are at last waking up to the calamity his papacy has become. And brace yourselves for more of the same very soon. We haven’t even gotten to the Synod yet! THAT is shaping up to be a real fiasco!

    Reply
  15. It’s late at night and I missed this post when it first came out but all I know is when I heard his speech and the fact that he was addressing our government at this crucial time in the history of abortion, with all the new findings on Planned Parenthood and the upcoming (at the time) vote to defund it and HE didn’t say a single word. I have little faith in this POPE and figure He too will resign within a few years.
    God Save US All

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popular on OnePeterFive

Share to...